Friday, March 13, 2015

Rand Paul's Plan to Restore Rights of Down & Out

          
Rand Paul is giving a college lecture at Bowie University.  He’s crusading against excessive fines, which can escalate out of control particularly for the poor and minorities.  He criticized both New York and Ferguson, MO for excessive revenue via fines.  I didn’t realize that a significant part of the budgets of cities was raised via fines.  Civil forfeiture is the idea that if you are selling drugs off your back porch as a fifteen year old, the government can come and take your parent’s house, or maybe Grandma owns the house.  There are excessive prison terms imposed for dealing in marijuana.  Rand Paul states that he is in fundamental agreement with the President on many of these social justice issues.  Rand Paul says to give judges more discretion on evaluating individual cases on their own merit.  Mandatory minimums are a bear.  What Blacks see and what Whites don’t is that the word “Nigger” just by itself wouldn’t have that much power.  But when you combine these racist proclivities with power and authority is when you have trouble.  If you are red lined by a Real Estate agent, or the place where you work judges people by their race, or police officers or others in the Justice system- - and maybe even insurance companies.  All of these play into racial oppression of the Black.   The caller’s point was (I think) that in some other world that was inherently fair- - you could say “Nigger” all day long and other racial barbs or indicate your own prejudice, and it would mean nothing. We are also reminded about voter registration laws and the for profit Prison system we have today.  Of course there is a “felon’s voting rights” movement today, perhaps because there are so many felons today.  Thom Hartman said that since 1980 we have quintupled the number of people incarcerated in prison.  In terms of racists getting made at you if you call them a racist- - there are a few exceptions to that.  The grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan would proudly call himself a racist.  We live in an era where walking home with skittles and an Arizona iced tea is a crime punishable by death.  Now there is news that the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity sings this and other racist songs on an institutional basis on at least two other campuses, located in Texas, and that it is a ritual type song taught and handed down from Seniors to Freshmen.

In my senior year in High School I learned in business law that “Corporations are people, my friend” and for decades I bought into this meme.  However as Hartman and others point out, these aren’t real people.  As Randy Rhodes says they don’t have colonscopies or get cancer, or ever attend the funeral of one of their peers.  There is no corporate death penalty.  The analogy I would like to use is the sort of “state” that Israel envisions for the Palestinians on the West Bank.  What they envision is not an actual “sovereign state” but rather little more than a glorified prison camp.  Unlike people with “Natural rights” (as Thomas Jefferson defines it) corporations are a legal fiction of the State, endowed with certain “privileges” by the state.   When the constitution grants freedom of the Press, it’s freedom of the press for People- NOT “The New York Times” as a corporate entity.  It’s people making USE of a printing press or making USE of a corporation to express their God given right to free speech.  Apparently Monsanto is bringing this case against Vermont’s full disclosure of GMO’s labeling law.  Monsanto is calling this law “legally compelled speech” when they have a right not to speak.  But as you know in the case of one FOX news outlet- - the Courts have expended this “free speech” right to say corporations have the right to flat-out Lie to the public- - if they so desire.  Or as in the case of Seattle hiking the minimum wages- - corporations can claim “unequal protection” via the fourteenth amendments because SOME Mc Donald’s have to pay higher minimum wages than other outlets.  And when it comes to the fifth amendment- - courts have seemed to rule that you MUST supply your DNA when asked for it even if it gives the government access to a whole host of things about who you are and your probable medical history.  But if you want corporations to surrender documents- - under some strange gymnastic rendering of the law- - corporations are protected by the Fifth Amendment.  This topic is being debated right now on the “Democracy Now” program.

One could argue that "teologically" that Function is ontologically preceding to "Form".   One Jeopardy question last night raised the issue of "what do you call speaking in similies and metaphors", which baffled me.  The answer was "speaking figuratively".  The word "figure" alludes to Form.  Forms can be both numbers and shapes.  Form is structure, and structural design.  "How do you make this".  You have to know about Form if you are going to instruct a 3 D printer.  But before you have form - - (logically speaking) you need to have the WHY before you have the HOW.  Or at least normally.  You want to achieve a certain outcome- - and so you go about with a drafting board designing the form.  I claim that with 9 - 11 you need to speak in Teological terms.  What was the goal of the 9 - 11 Comission?  Was it to cover up the truth?  How come 42% of the American people are suspicious- - don't believe the 9 - 11 comission.  They have doubts about their truthfulness.  Paranoid personalities are natural "teologically based individuals".  To a paranoid- - nothing just "happens" spontaniously- - there has to be an intelligence- - a reason behind it.  Someone was "planning something".   They look at what happens and say "It's all making SENSE now.  All of the individual pieces are coming together".  This is teological thinking.   I spoke of "speaking figuratively".  To me this does not exclude- - other "alligories" that don't necessarily have a one for one correspondence of form to form.  Many "alligories" are meant to evoke some emotion or image where if you break it down- - the components don't make sense.  I've heard a lot of Sunday sermons like this.  Many others would say "Well come people are all form and no substance".  So it would seem to me that SUBSTANCE would be the next aspect of "things" to worry about.  We have channeled down a lot of words that are related even though they might not on the face seem like it.  Substance is tied first of all to mass, but also gravity, and weight, and force is measured basically in weight per square inch.  Space comes into play.  If you believe my writings- - all space is "formatted" where matter has to be "compatable' with the space in it, just as programs must be compatable with the way a particularly hard drive is formatted.

There is a widespread explosions of explanations for Friday the thirteenth.  An old story I heard was that there was this one cruise ship that was christened on a Friday and the maiden voyage was on a Friday and the Captain was named Friday- - and the ship left the dock - - and was never heard from again.  Some would say the lunar month- - particularly when it comes to women’s menstral cycles- - begins on the thirteenth day of the month and there are thirteen periods per year.  Of course in the matriarchal society they had (way back when) there were thirteen witches in a coven.  Some people have stated that Purim in the book of Esther (a period just passed), occurred on the thirteenth day of a (lunar) month, and on a Friday, and it was the crisis point for the Jews and the Jews ended up being saved, and devout Christians read this story and said “Whatever is good for the Jews is bad for the Christians”.   If the Jim Spencer theory of the calendar is true, then President Lincoln was shot on Ford’s theater on Friday the thirteenth, though the Federation has always stated it was on Friday the fourteenth.

This whole thing about powdered alcohol seems to defy all known science.  Anybody knows when you boil alcohol it will evaporate before the water does.  So you have a distilled “spirit” you can capture.  But certain molecules are inherently a certain way.  Some molecules such as oils repel water and others are designed to cut sludge.  But if it were even theoretically possible to produce powdered alcohol it would have been done decades ago.  You can get your bottom dollar on that.  The implications though could be severe if true because I can see nine and ten year old kids stashing these packets in their pockets getting stoned over lunch break.  It would be an easy way to goose up a drink in a bar if you thought it was made too weak.

Bill Press was just on from yesterday and naturally during pledge drive all the hosts are making their donation pitches.  It sounds like something even I could afford with five dollars a month, and I get a free coffee thermal cup or whatever out of it.  I didn’t mean to imply in that blog my donation would be limited to three thousand dollars if I won Power Ball.  It would depend obviously on my exact winnings, but I assure you it would be considerably more than three thousand if I won big.  Today’s date is Thursday March 12, 2015 and I got up at six o clock on the dot.  I had Stephanie Miller on before seven and the computer booted up in a timely manner today.  I went down and got meds but didn’t feel really “OK” until I had the dollar twenty five coffee at the store.  I used my debit card for that, and cigarettes I didn’t need because I still have a half a pack because I’m smoking less.  I was sitting in the front room first and for an instant after I was back till the dining room opened and I took the unopened coffee into the dining room.  We had oatmeal for breakfast followed by an omlette and toast and butter and jelly.  It was more Stephanie Miller but I think I’ve about “heard all the news” and the reverberations of that.  They are predicting much warmer weather this weekend starting today.  The rest of the country is about fifty degrees warmer than it’s been the last couple months.  Chicago is now in the forties after ranging around a minus five or something for weeks.  All those mounds of snow have melted pretty quickly- - and the percentage of ground in the US with snow on it is back down to normal levels, it seems.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

- - - and the Bad News Keeps On Coming!

The only good news out there is that with the next bear market, all the rich fat cats are going to be brought down, too.  The future prognosis for the stock market has never looked worse.  Last night I read a whole lot of economic stuff in the blogs with charts galore saying that our energy consumption “is at deep recession levels” and that maybe we actually peaked in our energy consumption about 1979 at least nationally.   Industry peaked then and did not recover but perhaps personal wattage per hour consumption peaked in the mid nineties.  But regardless- - all this is indicative that oil prices will not be rising any time soon.  There was a video saying we are headed for a 25 year super recession- - and this video talked a lot about petro-dollars.  And I read something that said we actually had a “thirty year recession” from early 1870’s to almost the end of the 19th century.   This source just combines the recessions of ’73 and ’93.   In other aspects of the economy debt obligation ratio to the actual GDP is alarming.  It’s never been worse.  The GDP ratio to market “capitalization” has never been more adverse.  Here is where excessive “capitalization” in the market compared to GDP is a bad thing, and it’s the most adverse since 1929.   Worse yet is that the overall volicity of money has slowed to a crawl, and this chart would indicate we are still in a recession, or worse yet in a new recession.   Also new factory orders are taking a new dip indicating a new economic downturn is around the corner.  Household income has been bad- - but the latest news here is a slight upturn.   You know of course about the 62% for percentage of the work force participation.  Oh- - and there was yet another chart that showed that back fifty years ago FED stimulation boosted the economy by two dollars and forty-one cents.   But by the 1980’s this figure had shrunk to 45 cents or something, and today that figure has shrunk to seven cents.  This means for every dollar of printing press money the FED puts out- - there is only seven cents of stimulation.  And worse- - they are now saying that massive FED stimulation might even go negative at some near future date.   Putting all these economic statistics together- - things just look - - Bad - - all the way around.   So I guess maybe I don’t feel quite so alone in my own personal economic recession.   Both Judy and Dr Levy said years ago that “There (in essence) will be no recovery to this current recession” – and I’ve heard estimates of bad economic times were forecast till 2020 and perhaps beyond.

The police chief of Ferguson, MO has resigned.  This guy is the sixth Ferguson official to do so if you count judges and officers and clerks and the like.  There is now talk that the entire Ferguson police department may be dissolved and assumed by a bigger entity that recently took over another small city’s police department in the St Louis area.  Of course officer Darren Wilson has long since been off the force.  So I guess those “social justice” people like me on the left are getting our “pound of flesh” after all- - and deriving a certain satisfaction from it.  In late news - I had Sean Hannity on till the first commercial break.  Apparently two officers in the Ferguson PD were shot using a telescopic gun sight.  One of the officers is in critical condition and the other just had a shoulder wound.  After this I turned to Bill Carol and then it was NBC news.  Neither of these shows, nor Stephanie Miller or Thom Hartman had anything about this double officer shooting.  I think Hannity will use any and every excuse to rant some more about the Justice Department and the Obama administration, saying “they created the climate for it”.  Eric Holder felt it necessary to respond to the incident, which is almost unfortunate, because no matter what the AG says, Sean Hannity is going to accuse him of lying anyhow.  Of course Sean Hannity told so many lies in just the few minutes I had him on, to chronicle them one by one again would be a redundancy.

These Secret Service agent stories keep on coming.  First it was prostitutes during a Presidential trip.  Then it was the break and entry guy.  Now it's two secret service agents getting drunk at a party and then ramming their car into a White House barricade.  Apparently the car ran over a suspected bomb - - a potential explosive device.  Fortunately it didn't go off.  Of course I told you about the drone attacks while the President was at home.  One of these days - - I hate to say it, but the secret service agents are going to mess up one time too many and the President is going to suffer for it.  Something strange is going on here.

In terms of this "Blurred Lines" copyright contraversy, I'm siding with the so called plagurizers.  Because the media plays so little of both songs, Marvyn Gay's "Got to Give it Up" and the current hit- - I am by no means convinced any song stealing is going on here.  If anything "Blurred Lines" is a better song, but the media plays so little and I'm wondering "Are they saying that you can plagurize a drum beat?"  That's what it sounds like.  Unfortunately my friends on the Other Side don't agree with me.  The Federation, The Romulans, The Del Phi group, and the Arkturians have all come out strongly that Marvyn Gaye was plagurized.

Now the Republicans are not content with simply a single letter to Iran.  Now the Republicans are doing fundraising drives based on this “great thing they did” in putting the President of the United States in his place” as they see it.   Thirty years ago there was not an outfit like FOX news on because President Reagan has not made his 1987 FCC ruling that threw out the fairness doctrine.  I know of no sane individual who says that a few huge corporations running our news media is better than hundreds of private TV, Radio, and Newspaper outlets giving us our news.  Whatever “good things” are supposed to have happened by giving the ultra rich all this power- - did not happen.  We hear talk from them about “efficiency” and how the consumer is getting a “better deal” with only a few outlets.  The Republicans are acting as - - petulantly- - as grammar school children playing a game of “Nyah - - nyah”.   There ARE no adults in the room when it comes to the Republican Party.   One commentator said that the whole Republican party ought to be prosecuted under the Rico act or something.   We were told when Citizens United came down that “This ruling will insure a more robust political campaign- - and we believe in full disclosure of financial sources”.    Neither of these are the case today.  Historians will look back on this era fifty years from now and say that it was an era where Americans as a whole “lost their minds”.   Some lady caller just called in saying right after Bush was handed the Presidency in 2000 people were predicting “100 years of Republican rule”

 Hannity of course tells flat out lies.  But Hannity did mention these communacations with Bill Clinton when he went with this pedophile named Epstein to “orgy island” where they both had sex with under aged girls, and perhaps worse.  (?)  If Bill Clinton said he’s only used E mail twice in his whole life he’s a liar because Bill Clinton has four E mail accounts.  This “orgy island” type thing ties in with certain members of the British Royal family.  It is recommended that the Clinton “family serve” (guarded by Secret Service Agents) be given up to a third party such as a retired judge, to endeavor to electronically get information off of- - even though Hillary made it a point to say that any information she didn’t “decide that was relevant” to the government, she immediately deleted.  (I wonder why)  I have no emotional axe against Hillary - - one way or the other.  As I have said, it could well be she is the best person to we could nominate in the Democratic Party.  But I say that "If you really believe that- - then Prove it with a spirited primary with competetion.

I guess it's interesting to see what is ABSENT in today's society.  I think there is a void of main stream Christian churches like we used to regularly have.  Most of the major demoninations are shrinking.  The "local church" is becoming a thing of the past.  Another thing you don't see today is activity in the psychic community.  You'd think psychics would be doing a box office business given the turbulent times of these days, but this is not the case.  Nobody talks or even thinks about that stuff these days- - except for this writer- - - very occasionally.   Another thing absent that was very prevelent back in the sixties- - is folk rock- - beatnick poetry and the like.  There are no folk protests songs today that I'm aware of.   Of course it goes without saying that we don't have "Political convention" coverage during elections.  This has been a dying art of course for the past forty years.  But back in the day there used to be a lot of suspense around Party Conventions before they became strictly choriographed affairs, and got shorter and shorter and are now edited down to virtually an hour each night.   Today party officials are almost pathologically risk averse and everything is precisely timed almost to the minute.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

The Entrenched Antagonism of the Republican Party


Everything about the national news- - and everything about this national economy is like a long and never ending nightmare that you can't wake up from.  Not only that but every day and in every way things appear to only be getting worse.  We keep hearing these glimmers of hope like "The republicans are hopelessly divided" and "The Republican party is in shambles and has no direction and no leadership".   And yet there appear to steadily be fewer and fewer liberal outlets, and fewer venues by which liberals might express themselves.  It used to be liberal talk shows were common on the radio and that liberal TV talk shows were a dime a dozen.  No more.   Guess what the first thing to cross my mind when I heard about that Sigma Alpha Epselon story about the racist song?  I thought "How long will it be before somebody on the right tries to blame the disselution of this fraternity on the President?  We hear endless stories about drones and drone warfare.  And now the Secret Service is going to develope a whole anti drone campaign in the skies.   We know people aiming lasers at plain pilots can be located almost instantly with all of their GPS equipment or what have you.  The government has your DNA and the courts have ruled they can secure your DNA involentarily if you don't offer it up volentarily.  The government exhausts itself processing all those drug tests on people they run- - and all of this mind bending volume of data in personal databases trying to develop some sort of cinnister criminal profile on the innocent.  You are indeed guilty untill proved innocent today.

There is an epidemic of “what abou-ism” in the Republican party today.  But the trouble with this false equivalency thing- - - ie saying that John Kerry visiting Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua in 1983 or Nancy Pelosi visiting Assad in 2007 were offences of the democrats is this.  You can’t have it both ways.  If you are going to say two isolated democrats were wrong in what they did, are YOU then going to say YOU were wrong, senator Cotton of Arkansas, for what YOU did.  Cotton is a Freshman senator, and it used to be that Freshmen by in large kept their mouths shut for the first year or two, our of deference to their senior members.  But Ted Cruz sure broke that mold.  He was a freshman senator that virtually became the leader and spokesman for the republican senate overnight.  I say again that IF you believe the democrats were WRONG in what they did, doesn’t that make YOU wrong, also?  Are you happy with that kind of flimsy rationalization of your actions?   First of all John Kerry went to a government leader to speak ABOUT what the President was doing in illegally funding the Contras, and I stress the word Illegal.  Reagan himself should have been dealing with Daniel Ortega, but he didn’t but instead went behind his back.  So John Kerry was explaining this to Ortega.  But if Kerry did something wrong, there was nothing barring use of the Logan act against John Kerry, if that’s the direction you really want to go.   If you thought those charges would stand up in court you could have brought them, but you didn’t.  Now in excess of thirty years later you are comparing the acts of ONE MAN to an entire Republican delegation of Senators trying to openly sabotage not only a Presidential negotiation, but negotiations between Iran and Russia, and China and Germany and others.  This is a much more serious offence.  And these Republicans were very overt about their intent.  Their intent was to sabotage these delicate negotiations.  Contrast this with President Reagan who didn’t even regard Daniel Ortega AS the leader of Nicaragua.  And you’re trying to compare these actions?   Shawn Hannity doesn’t even believe these Republicans are hard enough right.  For him they aren’t intransigent enough.  Oh- - and by the way- - when it comes to Obama conducting “unconstitutional acts” my saying is “Put up or shut up”.  These republicans aren’t going to file Impeachment charges against President Obama.  They haven’t got the guts.  They know they’d lose.   It’s like the issue of Abortion.  If all abortions were made illegal tomorrow, the republicans would have a lot less to whine about.  It’s ditto for the actions of this president.   They just want to whine and whine through the President’s final two years in office.  And to act as if they are going to win in two years is really jumping the gun on reality.    And it turns out that in the Iranian letter or message sent in response- - many Iranian leaders speak perfect English and were well educated in the ways of the Constitution and American government, and reminded the Republicans that they don’t know the ways of their own government.  Anybody who wasn’t brain dead would feel a sense of shame in this, but not the Republicans.  They don’t mind being called Stupid.  They wear stupidity like a badge.

One of the stupid Wayne Dyre statements I just heard was the saying “Change your thoughts and change your world”.  I’ll give you a very immediate example of how utterly stupid a notion this is.  Some people analyzing my writings will note as of late, and notably in the past few weeks, that my sympathies have shifted over from relatively pro Sunni to a more pro Shiite stance.  So did the Shiites suddenly become, just NOW, a better sect than the Sunnis just because I have refined certain positions?  Of course not!  The idea is completely stupid.  And the thing is I HAVEN’T suddenly decided that Shiites are better than Sunnis.  I based my views in circumstances.  Which is something many evangelists claim never to do.  And in part I believe them because their heads are in the clouds detached from reality most of the time.   For a long time I feared that Iran was going nuclear and their first item on the agenda was wiping out Israel.  But I wasn’t thinking clearly.   Because although other nations such as Pakistan and Israel, and North Korea HAVE Nukes- - Iran does NOT have Nukes.  They didn’t have Nukes twenty years ago and they don’t have them now, and won’t have them in the foreseeable future.  People who predict that Iran will have Nukes “within a few months” are probably the same people tht are predicting major rain storms in California- - any week now!   We’re waiting!   Netenyahoo called Iran’s former leader Akmedinijab “A wolf in wolf’s clothing” and he calls their current leader Ruhani- - “a Sheep in wolf’s clothing”.   But clearly it isn’t just Iran dealing with the United States but Germany and Russia and all of those other UN Nations that are involved.   One blogger referred to Syrian leader Assad as “secular”.   I’ve also heard that “Assad protects ancient Christian sects”.   So- - I don’t know.  If you’re a Christian you’re supposed to back Assad and if you’re a Jew you’re supposed to back- - who? - - ISIS?  I don’t know!   I posted that blog post last night with all of the stuff about Saudi Arabia being allied with Israel highlighted.  You see Judy says that the Arab and the Jew are natural enemies because it says so in the Bible.  But actually the Bible doesn’t make the ‘Ishmeal” claim Judy and Dr Levy make.  No. It’s the Muslims that make THAT claim.  NOT the Bible.  The last we ever hear about the Ishmealites is that a band of them transported Joseph off to Egypt as a slave.   And need I remind you there are an awful lot of non Arab (hence non Semitic) Muslims.  You have your Iranians and your Pakistanis, and even the Turks for that matter, and Indonesians, and the “Nation of Islam” in this country, who are Black.   And by the way those of you thinking I used to be a Sunni lover- - nobody including me has ever liked the form of government in Saudi Arabia, or their Sheria Law.  I’ve always thought the Bushes and the Saudis were just too Close!

Not to say “I told you so” or anything but the Dow Jones Industrials are down over five hundred points from their highs just last week.  So this is a way of saying that stocks are about in the range where they were back in January when I was recommending a “Sell” in the market.  I see no reason why this market won’t stay in this negative “bent” for the foreseeable future.  Once it gets a notion in its mind, the market runs with it.  The NASDAC fell 82 points to 4,859 - - or back below the five thousand dollar level.   Maybe the price of California gas at the pump is way up but crude oil world is still at $48.00 a barrel.

I’m listening to Norman Goldman on audio.  Bernie Sanders is not a “socialist”.  I’ve heard him speak an awful lot and I observe no bent twords socialism.  Sanders in his own words, is not a quitter.  He may lose a particular election big, and come back multiple times and keep on fighting- till he wins.  Sanders has a solid base supporting him for US Senate in Vermont, and all the people who know him speak well of him.  Now Goldman is saying that some people feel Hillary was cheated out of the nomination in 2008.  I just think the Obama opposition just rolled over and played dead.  Winning big in elections in big states week after week, apparently counted for nothing.  The Obama people were so afraid of “something” maybe a wayward sneeze toppling their house of cards- - they would not even ALLOW her name to be placed in Nomination in 2008.  What were they so damn afraid of?  Even Maggie Horton smells fear in an individual.  And Eve Larsen reeks of FEAR.   I watched the Shawn Hannity problem and listened to that Hillary interview.  She was calm and cool as a cucumber in that interview and answered questions to my satisfaction.  I don’t know about you.  I would have only added that with people like Snowden running around hacking government computers, her computer system and server proved itself to be a whole lot safer.  Hillary wasn’t hacked once.  The way Hillary explained it- - she did exactly the things she was supposed to do.  Like I say I’m no Hillary groupy - - if just “calling it as I see it”, as the expression goes.  To me it's a matter of balls and strikes.

Monday, March 09, 2015

Why Are Saudi Arabia and Israel So Cozy Now?

Well - - -  We've given so much money to the repressive Saudi Arabian regeme.  We know that the Saidis are allied with Bin Laden.  Guess who else the Saudis are allied with now?
Although Moussaoui’s credibility came under immediate attack from the Saudi kingdom, his assertions mesh with accounts from members of the U.S. Congress who have seen a secret portion of the 9/11 report that addresses alleged Saudi support for al-Qaeda.
Further complicating the predicament for Saudi Arabia is that, more recently, Saudi and other Persian Gulf oil sheikdoms have been identified as backers of Sunni militants fighting in Syria to overthrow the largely secular regime of President Bashar al-Assad. The major rebel force benefiting from this support is al-Nusra Front, al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria.
In other words, the Saudis appear to have continued a covert relationship with al-Qaeda-connected jihadists to the present day.
The Israeli Exposure
And, like the Saudis, the Israelis have sided with the Sunni militants in Syria because the Israelis share the Saudi view that Iran and the so-called “Shiite crescent” – reaching from Tehran and Baghdad to Damascus and Beirut – is the greatest threat to their interests in the Middle East.
That shared concern has pushed Israel and Saudi Arabia into a de facto alliance, though the collaboration between Jerusalem and Riyadh has been mostly kept out of the public eye. Still, it has occasionally peeked out from under the covers as the two governments deploy their complementary assets – Saudi oil and money and Israeli political and media clout – in areas where they have mutual interests.
In recent years, these historic enemies have cooperated in their joint disdain for the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt (which was overthrown in 2013), in seeking the ouster of the Assad regime in Syria, and in pressing for a more hostile U.S. posture toward Iran.
Israel and Saudi Arabia also have collaborated in efforts to put the squeeze on Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, who is deemed a key supporter of both Iran and Syria. The Saudis have used their power over oil production to drive down prices and hurt Russia’s economy, while U.S. neoconservatives – who share Israel’s geopolitical world view – were at the forefront of the coup that ousted Ukraine’s pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych in 2014.
The behind-the-scenes Israeli-Saudi alliance has put the two governments – uncomfortably at times – on the side of Sunni jihadists battling Shiite influence in Syria, Lebanon and even Iraq. On Jan. 18, 2015, for instance, Israel attacked Lebanese-Iranian advisers assisting Assad’s government in Syria, killing several members of Hezbollah and an Iranian general. These military advisors were engaged in operations against al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front.
Meanwhile, Israel has refrained from attacking Nusra Front militants who have seized Syrian territory near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. One source familiar with U.S. intelligence information on Syria told me that Israel has a “non-aggression pact” with these Nusra forces.
An Odd Alliance
Israel’s odd-couple alliances with Sunni interests have evolved over the past several years, as Israel and Saudi Arabia emerged as strange bedfellows in the geopolitical struggle against Shiite-ruled Iran and its allies in Iraq, Syria and southern Lebanon. In Syria, for instance, senior Israelis have made clear they would prefer Sunni extremists to prevail in the civil war rather than Assad, who is an Alawite, a branch of Shiite Islam.
In September 2013, Israel’s Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren, then a close adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, told the Jerusalem Post that Israel favored the Sunni extremists over Assad.
“The greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc,” Oren told the Jerusalem Post inan interview. “We always wanted Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran.” He said this was the case even if the “bad guys” were affiliated with al-Qaeda.
And, in June 2014, speaking as a former ambassador at an Aspen Institute conference, Oren expanded on his position, saying Israel would even prefer a victory by the brutal Islamic State over continuation of the Iranian-backed Assad in Syria. “From Israel’s perspective, if there’s got to be an evil that’s got to prevail, let the Sunni evil prevail,” Oren said.
Skepticism and Doubt
In August 2013, when I first reported on the growing relationship between Israel and Saudi Arabia in an article entitled “The Saudi-Israeli Superpower,” the story was met with much skepticism. But, increasingly, this secret alliance has gone public.
On Oct. 1, 2013, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu hinted at it in his United Nations General Assembly speech, which was largely devoted to excoriating Iran over its nuclear program and threatening a unilateral Israeli military strike.
Amid the bellicosity, Netanyahu dropped in a largely missed clue about the evolving power relationships in the Middle East, saying: “The dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran and the emergence of other threats in our region have led many of our Arab neighbors to recognize, finally recognize, that Israel is not their enemy. And this affords us the opportunity to overcome the historic animosities and build new relationships, new friendships, new hopes.”
The next day, Israel’s Channel 2 TV news reported that senior Israeli security officials had met with a high-level Gulf state counterpart in Jerusalem, believed to be Prince Bandar, the former Saudi ambassador to the United States who was then head of Saudi intelligence.
The reality of this unlikely alliance has now even reached the mainstream U.S. media. For instance, Time magazine correspondent Joe Klein described the new coziness in an article in the Jan. 19, 2015 issue.
He wrote: “On May 26, 2014, an unprecedented public conversation took place in Brussels. Two former high-ranking spymasters of Israel and Saudi Arabia – Amos Yadlin and Prince Turki al-Faisal – sat together for more than an hour, talking regional politics in a conversation moderated by the Washington Post’s David Ignatius.
“They disagreed on some things, like the exact nature of an Israel-Palestine peace settlement, and agreed on others: the severity of the Iranian nuclear threat, the need to support the new military government in Egypt, the demand for concerted international action in Syria. The most striking statement came from Prince Turki. He said the Arabs had ‘crossed the Rubicon’ and ‘don’t want to fight Israel anymore.’”
Though Klein detected only the bright side of this détente, there was a dark side as well, as referenced in Moussaoui’s deposition, which identified Prince Turki as one of al-Qaeda’s backers. Perhaps even more unsettling was his listing of Prince Bandar, who had long presented himself as a U.S. friend, so close to the Bush Family that he was nicknamed “Bandar Bush.”
Moussaoui claimed that he discussed a plan to shoot down Air Force One with a Stinger missile with a staff member at the Saudi Embassy in Washington, at a time when Bandar was the ambassador to the United States.
According to the New York Times article by Scott Shane, Moussaoui said he was assigned to “find a location where it may be suitable to launch a Stinger attack and then, after, be able to escape,” but that he was arrested on Aug. 16, 2001, before he could carry out the reconnaissance mission.
The thought of anyone in the Saudi embassy, then under the control of “Bandar Bush,” scheming with al-Qaeda to shoot down George W. Bush’s Air Force One is shocking, if true. The notion would have been considered unthinkable even after the 9/11 attacks, which involved 15 Saudis among the 19 hijackers.
After those terror attacks which killed nearly 3,000 Americans, Bandar went to the White House and persuaded Bush to arrange for the rapid extraction of bin Laden’s family members and other Saudis in the United States. Bush agreed to help get those Saudi nationals out on the first flights allowed back into the air.
Bandar’s intervention undercut the FBI’s chance to learn more about the ties between Osama bin Laden and the 9/11 perpetrators by giving FBI agents only time for cursory interviews with the departing Saudis.
Bandar himself was close to the bin Laden family and acknowledged having met Osama bin Laden in the context of bin Laden thanking Bandar for his help financing the jihad project in Afghanistan during the 1980s. “I was not impressed, to be honest with you,” Bandar told CNN’s Larry King about bin Laden. “I thought he was simple and very quiet guy.”

The Saudi government claimed to have broken ties with bin Laden in the early 1990s when he began targeting the United States because President George H.W. Bush had stationed U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, but – if Moussaoui is telling the truth – al-Qaeda would have still counted Bandar among its supporters in the late 1990s.

Now the Republican Senate Is Into Open Sabotage


It has become necessary for me to clarify my position in ISIS because some of the opinions I have stated on line may come across as confusing or just confused.  For instance I said that due to the poor “trust factor” in the US granting military aid to people, that perhaps we better hold off unless we should make things worse.  I would repeat the line from the latest posting of “We made you and we can just as easily break you”.  We make ourselves out to be like God, almost drunk on our own power.  Of course this whole line of God or a possessive parent of “I brought you into this world, and I can take you out” is highly egotistical coming from either God or such a parent.  A five word question comes to mind- particularly addressing God.  “What would be the point?” and this question has resonated around like an echo chamber in my mind.  At first when I first heard about all these fantastic capturing of key Iraqi cities I thought “Well it’s a flash in the pan and it can’t last”.  Then I thought “Well perhaps it’s old generals from the Bath party of Saddam, so maybe they’re not so bad”.   And I heard these stories about ISIS is on the internet and has a whole lot of funding from rich people.  Again I thought, “How bad can an organization be that seeks popularity via the internet?”  Then I heard Sean Hannity and other righties saying “Obama’s bombing efforts have been to no avail.  ISIS has only gotten stronger”.  I didn’t know what to think.  But now we know that not only do the Kurds hate ISIS but also all of the Shiites, and vast numbers of Sunnis are opposed to ISIS.  Now we hear that ISIS wants to wipe out remnents of all prior civilizations.  Not even seventy years of Bolshivism in the Soviet Block did that.  When you get an outfit that cedes all power in itself rather than scripture, like a Jim Jones cult, you’re dealing with something very dangerous.   The Koran plainly states that he who sheds the blood of an innocent person, shall be culpable of that man’s blood.   But ISIS is what Thom and others have said about it.  It’s a death cult and little more than that.

Well now the Republicans have come right out with it.   47 Republican senators have send an “open letter” to the Iranian government telling Iran NOT to go along with the deal with the United States “because we have a constitutional system here”.  And they need to be made aware that a future Presidential administration could nullify the treaty.  This act borders in treason in my opinion in an area where it’s improper to venture.  Johnson talked to Everett Dirkson in the fall of 1968 about Nixon reaching out to South Viet Nam and saying “Wait, and I’ll give you a better deal”.  Of course we don’t know that they ever got that “Better Deal” from Nixon.  Hartman also read from a Christian Science Monitor from just 2013 with recent information in it about the workings of the Iranian government in September of 1980 when the majority of thought in Iran was that occupying the US embassy was misguided and wrong.   Adolph Hitler is quoted by FDR is ‘Never put out a small falsehood.  Make it a whopper and keep repeating it over and over again.  If the Bill Casey sabotage story is a falsehood then it needs to be ruthlessly exposed.  But if it’s true, we need to know that, too.

There is a news poll out now which states that FOX news is the most trusted news network in America and I guess 33% or something here is considered good ratings.  But CNN is the second most trusted news network at 22% or something.  NBC and CBS and such are down at around ten percent.  A clear majority of Republicans trust FOX news.  I say all this because of the blatency of the story above- - - where now you can openly sabotage negotiations between the President and a Foreign Power, is something which formerly would be done in the most hushed of whispers which would never see the light of day in the Press, such as the Bill Casey thing with Iran.  But the courts have gone further with that story several years saying that FOX news or any local news outlet has an inherent right to lie, and to compel their employees to lie.  And if those employees of a news outlet refuse to go along with the lie their superiors are foisting on them, then said employees deserve to be fired.  And Thom Hartman agrees with the Court ruling- and I guess this state was Florida.  It was an issue with Monsanto and beef growth hormones being safe or not.   Society has reached the point of institutionalized moral depravity.

Sigma Alpha Epselon - - - has been decommissioned at the University of Oklahoma because the frat members were singing a racist song.  Unfortunately as the moral climate in this country worstens, we’re going to be seeing this sort of thing more and more.  The Ku Klux Klan has been sending flyers at random to people’s homes, both White and Black, in the cities of Selma and Montgomery “Just to remind the people of these communities that the KKK is still around, and feel free to join them at any time”.   So I guess this is Free Speech and not illegal.  It’s still distasteful.  This shooting thing in Madison, Wisconsin - - doesn’t appear to be as serious to me as others.  It’s not clear that the victim was entirely innocent.  And also Wisconsin has laws which guarantee a more prompt impartial investigation of the act.   At a federal level there is a chance that a law will be passed which forbids the enforcement of laws with the sole purpose of raising revenue.  To me this is a moral gray area.  Ask me later.

I wanted to speak briefly here about these "Once Upon a Time" stories.  They always seem to feature women with the most evil, vindictive roles, who say "I've suffered pain in my life and my avowed goal is to make sure my enemies suffer equal or greater pain".  That's a pretty pathetic way to live.  Then you have Regina, I believe, in one episode offered to meet "the man of her dreams" by her fairy godmother or something.  And for some reason Regina balks at this oppertunity, as though Evil were so much more fulfilling.  The thing is that Christian leaders love to judge.  One could just as easily put the shoe on the other foot if you had a female, who was less than confident about herself, thinking that "God has the perfect man for me" and if it didn't look like it was going to work out, these Christian leaders would say to her "Well you were presumptuous.  How dare you use your own emotional desires and foist them on God and think somehow God will do your bidding?"  In general - - - I would say "It's safer to assume that God will never intervene in your life".  But at the same time you don't want to be judged in the next life by "That one chance- - the long shot with the limb in the way - - that you didn't take, because it was too risky, that now you learn that "You should have trusted God on".   On the other hand Neil of KFI states that prayer is like orgasms to a prostitute.  If you aren't faking it- - then you've got major emotional problems.   (I read that in a book somewhere)  And plan your life accordingly.  But then if you actually did this other Christian leaders would flag your conduct and say "You should be living in the expectation of a Faith miracle, or else you're not truly living by Faith".  So they give it to you going and coming.   The problem with character among Christians (and I didn't listen to any of Neil of KFI's show) is that Christians these days are judged not "integrity" or "character" or by what they give others, but rather- by what God has given them, and therewith come their "bragging rights".

Sunday, March 08, 2015

Twin Spin - Double Play

Gang-Raped Saudi Woman Sentenced to 200 Lashes, 6 Months in Jail 

 -so I say "God Damn the Obama Administration"

I anger is 'kindled against the President' because- - he won't go after the prosecution of Bush or Chaney or Wolfiwitz or any of the any other perpetrators of the Iraqi and Afghan wars.  He claims he wants "to put the past behind him".   He gets a nomination for Attorney General pushed through, who is waist deep is corruption.  He goes after whistle blowers, and I need to investigate this one further.  He is the Drone king when it comes to certain isolated terror suspects.  He won't ever admit it when he makes obvious mistakes and miscalculations.  But he displays this utter detatchedness when it comes to making speeches.  If he's really that much for women's rights, he wouldn't be in bed with the chiefest of sinners (to use Pauline termanology) when it comes to offences against women.  He makes me sick!  His stance on energy and pollution regulation enforcement is apalling.  I've just had it.  And now he's coming after my OWN medical insurance- - according to two independent sources.  President Obama is nothing but a shameless Fraud!

Outlets from Breitbart to Press TV to Jerusalem Post (from which the headline of this post is taken) are reporting with shock on this disturbing crime.
As the US considers openly arming the major, ISIS-linked, al-Qaeda terrorist branch operating in Syria, one of the major US state-terrorist allies, Saudi Arabia, has decided to lash a woman 200 times for being gang-raped by seven men.  Her actual crime was leaving her house, thus making being gang-raped her own fault, similar to how the US governmentannounced that 12 year old black child Tamir Rice’s being instantly shot by US domestic forces was his own fault, because he was playing with a toy gun outside (toy guns are available in virtually every US grocery and convenience store).
Saudi Arabia is also currently carrying out a sentence of 1,000 lashes of a man for having a blog that questioned Islam.  After his first of 10 sets of 100 lashes, the next set had to be delayed so he wouldn’t die.
Amnesty International reported that the country became even more repressive under the last king, who recently died, whom the US government and media dishonestly praised as having made things better.
The US has been supporting Saudi Arabia since the 1930s, around the time Saudi oil was discovered.
In 2010, the Obama regime secured a 60 billion dollar lethal weapons sale to the Saudi dictatorship, and then secured a 640 million dollar sale of banned  (as reported by Foreign Policy mag) cluster bombs (an Obama weapon of choice) to same.
The US in 2009 accused Saudi Arabia of allowing private donations to  the major Sunni non-state terror groups including al Qaeda and the Taliban.
The Saudi government itself, including the new head dictator (“king”), stands credibly accused of providing financing for the 9/11 attacks.  
The US continues to censor the part of the 9/11 investigation that covered Saudi Arabia.
Author and UK-based colleague on Twitter

Obama Is Short On Compassion and Long On Brute Force

USA Today reports:
Obama has issued just 64 pardons in his presidency — fewer than any president since James Garfield was assassinated in 1881.
This is all the more dramatic given that Garfield served only 200 days as president before being killed.
In contrast, here are some the past numbers of presidential pardons (not including the presidents with low numbers):
  • Thomas Jefferson 119
  • James Madison 196
  • James Monroe 419
  • John Quincy Adams 183
  • Andre Jackson 386
  • Martin Van Buren 168
  • John Tyler 209
  • James Polk 268
  • Millard Fillmore 170
  • Franklin Pierce 142
  • James Buchanan 150
  • Abraham Lincoln 343
  • Andrew Johnson 7,000
  • Ulysses S. Grant 1,332
  • Rutherford Hayes 893
  • Chester Arthur 337
  • Grover Cleveland 1,107
  • Benjamin Harrison 613
  • William McKinley 918
  • Teddy Roosevelt 981
  • William Taft 758
  • Woodrow Wilson 2,480
  • Warren Harding 800
  • Calvin Coolidge 1,545
  • Herbert Hoover 1,385
  • FDR 3,687
  • Harry Truman 2,044
  • Dwight Eisenhower 1,157
  • JFK 575
  • Lyndon Johnson 1,187
  • Richard Nixon 926
Not only is Obama less charitable in pardoning people than most presidents, but he has also prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined.
Indeed, Obama has sentenced whistleblowers to 25 times the jail time of all prior U.S. presidentscombined.
In reality, Obama – even more than Bush or other presidents – is protecting criminal activity by prosecuting and harassing whistleblowers.
Indeed, Obama has prosecuted fewer financial crimes than President Reagan, Clinton or either of the Bush presidents.   As bad as the Bush administration was – they at least prosecuted the heads of Enron, Worldcom and some other white collar crooks. In contrast, Obama hasn’t prosecuted even one high-level Wall Street executive.
The man is short on compassion and long on brute force …and when you stand at the Great White Throne - - your life won't be judged on how well you can read a teleprompter speech.