The Twelfth Dimension (The Face of God)

Then Ward Cleaver spun another tale.  Once there was a land where Mr Evans husband of Marlena was exploring with his Silver Hammer that he used to smash sense into either people or things that could not be redeemed any other way.  He had found this Hammer made of Silver under a manhole cover that he was told not to lift untill Father Danien had sprinkled holy water on it.  And there was a great sparking and combustion for a while, and then the sparking suddenly stopped once sufficient water had been poured on it.  And father Damien told him 'It's safe to pick up now.   One day after this he happened upon a strange polyhedranal Stone with eleven zodiac signs listed and Six" wisdom of life' sayings listed on each face of the eleven signs showing.  But the bottom was super glued to some metal base and he could not pry the Stone loose to see what lay on the remaining face.  Determined to leave no Stone Unturned he took his Silver Hammer and bashed the stone lose from its base.  But alas the glaire of Horris was too strong and hurt his eyes and was ecclipsing his view of any zidialogical sign.  But then a gentleman named Mr. Land came by with some magic specticals and said "You'll be able to see with these" because with these specticals you'll be able to see developments in moments that would otherwise take Days.  Mr Land said "Speak of these things as you Find"  And the saying came to his mind "This is the Stone that was rejected but turned out to be the most important one".  So he put the specticles on suddenly the glair was gone and he took these tobe magic lenses - - and behind the missing sign was indeed the sign of the ram.  And there were six phrases on this face as there had been on all of the others making 72 sayings with these six included.  The six expressions were FORTUNE TELLER - MONEY -POISON IVEY - I JUST CAN'T BE SATISFIED - WHAT TO DO - BYE, BYE, JOHNNY

Actually perhaps they should call the Higgs Boson the Christ particle.  Because without it - nothing as we know it was formatted or "made" as it was made.  In the Beginning was the Higgs Boson because IT IS - by definition "The Beginning" and what went on ontologically Before this - - does not Matter.  It's a smart planner who has figured out everything that might go wrong and every way a contingency could break - works out in His favor anyhow.  Track thirteen of Album Thirteen of the Rolling Stones has us gazing at the face of Christ.  So just what does this Christ particle, the Boson look like?  If it's a round hoop is it turning?  Is it setting up some kind of gyroscopic field that "slows down movement" the way gyroscopes do and that You Tube speaker was alluding to that the boson field did?  And what if you are on the "under side of the boson?"  What then?  Do you see things turning the opposite way and are all of the boson properties reversed?  First you have to know what constitutes a "side" in this analogy.  We know that the bias is tword the plane this hypothetical gyrooscope is acclimated.  And any boson could set its own rules by being acclimated any way it wants but being the conformist these Church men are- - you know if you've seen one you've seen them all, like an electron or a penis.  (some women say)  It's just a "utility" to "get the job done".  That's how they see one.  If you times 13 x 13 you get 169 which breaks down to a seven numerologically, and so the Larry Normal saying is true "The Lamb rolled a seven back to Paradise".  We know occasionally God likes to amuse himself by shooting craps.  Sometimes people actually to plan things that work out exactly as they intended.  This is why intelligence in your enemies is a thing to be greatly feared.  It's OK if your enemy is smart enough to reason with- - but you don't want him so smart he can think rings around you as the drop of a hat.  Many people don't know they are karmically outgunned untill it's too late- - and they learn it in the Next Life.  And sometimes they learn it in This Life.  (selah)   Clowie is a "Novella" creature- - who has planned everything out and laid the trap beautifully.  We now take up the narritive.  You have Jennifer in tears at the door after one of those little eye opening conversations with Clowie.  It proceeded along the same lines as when Addison De Witt lowered the boom on Eve Kerrington in “All About Eve” and now the only question remains as to whether Jennifer, like Eve will put on the academy award performance of her life.  Personally, I’d pass on that.  Even if I am told "If you don't capitulate" then Innocent Third Parties will Suffer Harm - - you just better be damned sure that my ethics are higher than Yours.  Because if you were in my shoes you wouldn't think twice about harming Innocent Third Parties.  You've already proven that.

  Janet met me outside and offered me instant coffee and a roll from the bakery.  I looked for one of Dana’s smaller 16 oz cups from the closet.  I noticed several rolls of toilet paper were taking up room on the shelf in the corner almost pushing the cups off the shelf and wonder how the hell they got there or when.  Last night as I was taking off my New Balance shoes, I noticed some kind of a knife slice or something near the soul of the shoe, separating the thing and wonder how THAT got there.  I turned off Nicole Sandler.  I’ve overdosed on radio this morning and I’m not going to talk about any of it.  I have kind of a problem with Moe Kelly and his guest.  You have a guy whose job it is to play rap music all day long and now he’s saying he wouldn’t touch certain rap music with a ten foot pole and how morally indignent they are using this James Dobson line about how kids are all like giant sponges and imitate anything they see on the screen or hear on the radio.  I got to thinking “Maybe Born Again converts ARE that dumb, which is why they are so easy to “turn” but I never was and I’m not and my moral values are not affected by some particular popular song I hear on the radio.  This is a commemoration of the day Christ died and I think it would be inappropriate to the day to get into the usual clap trap you hear on the radio.  This is a day to think of the things of God on thoughtful meditation.

S U B A T O M I C - P A R T I C L E S - I N - R E V I E W

Last night it was Syracruise beating Indiana but I don’t know if they actually won the game.  Things kept distracting me.  Either they were in commercial of half time or I had it turned into Jeopardy or Wheel of Fortune.  Finally I asked Bill and I turned it to the Vampire Diaries and then turned the computer on and read about bosons in the generic sense of the word, just so we know what the hell we’re talking about.  It seems that all sub atomic particles are divided into bosons and fermians or something, and that Quarks and Leptons are subdivions of Quarks, and that hadrons are subdivisions of Quarks, which appear in groups, and that Baryons are a certain kind of three particle quark, which has all three “color charges” and that anti Baryons have anti-color charges.   But that bosons have neither mass nor electric charge nor color charge.   Most of the generic Google search on bosons, led you to stuff on the newly confirmed “God particle” and news reports on this and how they are key to six important aspects of science, and how they were key to the Creation of the Universe.

I was going to hold off doing this posting but what the heck, I'm not doing anything for the next hour or so so I might as well do this now.  Of course last time we talked about the Imam Mhadi or the 12th Imam of Shiite Islam.  My guess that the Eleventh Imam died centuries ago.  You've heard the expression of how "The Devil is in the Details".  So people can talk in either generalities or specifics.  But somehow an actual, specific event that happened to you or a loved one is a lot more REAL than some sort of mathematical probability as to what is "supposed" to happen.  So we say that there are Twelve Dimensions "in theory" but there are only eleven Specific ones.  The twelfth dimension is what I call the Reality Dimension.  Something is either Real or Not Real.  From this frame of view- - something is not to be ruled out as "Invalid" or "Unsound" merely because it is Not Real.  If you say there is no known evidence for UFO's or life on other planets, to some logical mind they might well infer "OK, then what that tells me is that all the Evidence for UFO's is Unknown.  No problem at all.  But there are many ways to "Do" the Twelve.  You can arrange them in a row of square blocks three by four.  You can divide them up in a circle like a horoscope.  You can do one of those old time astrological readings with the 45 degree triangles around the perimeter of the little square- - and twelve of these 45 degree right triangles neatly fit into the space if you turn them right.  Then there are those pentogonal duo-decahedran paper weight things that are callendars you may get from your bank.  This is a cubic pentagon with each side angled 72 degrees - and each face having five edges- but the whole thing has twelve faces and all of them are symmetrical.  Behold there is a sense of Five-ness even in the VOID because VOID adds up to fifty - - numerologically.  Therefore he who surrenders to the Void, is only surrendering to the five points of present Reality that he can't escape anyway.  (Selah)  But there is another way you can "Do" twelve. You can take a Fifteen Triangle or a triangulation of the number five- - which actually can be "perimetered" by twelve blocks since the three at the corners do double duty on two sides.  Then you just knock out a triangle of three blocks in the middle.  We can employ numerology to help us along here.  For instance the number 12 is a numerological "three" whereas the 11 specific dimensions would weigh out to a numerological "two".  So we're back to that again.  The word SEED is a numerological 33 and Jesus died on the cross at age 33, which is three the hard way in craps.  Jesus was having a crappy day.  Of course we told you a Six or  3 and 3 was the union of the strong God principle and the darker Creation principle.  We spoke of "Null space" not having any fixed points you could "point' to for want of variety in terms here.  Some may ask "How could you point and say "there" in this "Void Space" and have that point "refer" to anything?   In C programming this is spoken us as a non initialized variable crap shoot.  You aren't guarenteed that values will default at zero.  They would be anything.  But this space as we said is not Formatted- - .  This is what the Higgs Boson does is "Format" this Void space into the time and mass and space we see.  An unformatted computer disk has NO usable space you can actually use.  The Boson is necessary because the Boson itself gives space its "nature' of being the sort of Space we relate to.  How interesting that even in the VOID there is this sense of "five-ness" or pick any five points.  (previous posting)  By the way- the notion of Time and Space being co-equal dimensions on an equal footing- - - is what you call - - a minority idea with me.  I tend to dislike terms such as the "space-time contimuous" or "traveling through space-time" because such terms easily lend themselves to abuse by quacks to throw such terms and other more complicated ones into a sentense like alphabet soup, and we're all supposed to stand up and salute.

I'd like to talk about two of my Eleven dimensions.  As you know we have dimensions of space, and the dimension of time, and the dimensions of karma, and the dimensions of Things.  I would now like to single out two of the dimensions of Things that have gotten short shrift in the past.  You know what Mass is.  Why Mass is not considered a dimension by scientists I am not sure.  You all know what "Awareness" or "being sensient' is.  This is sensory - - not extra sensory- - perception.  We experiance this one every day.  But some may wonder about the idea of FORM.  How is this a dimension.  We know that matter has a FORM.  We just talked about Formatted Space- - - well the word FORM is closely related to Formatted.  It's someone telling you what these atoms will BE.  It's the program.  It's the blueprint.  It's the template.  It's the intelligence, it's the abtraction that has the ability to both Plan out something and then draw a blueprint which if followed precisely- - will Exicute the form.  Form can be exicuted in any Medium - - as we discussed a few weeks ago.  FORM can be called "The workmanship of God".  Form is a Dynamic.  There can be highly developed form, and much broader more generalized form.  One might call Form like Time one of those "one way dimensions" in that it has a beginning but no end.  With other dimensions such as space- - one direction is as Good as its opposite direction.  Form is like amplitude in that it can be turned up or down.  By the way Gravity can be turned Up or Down under Einstein theory - - .  I don't know if it can be turned OFF all together but it most certainly can be turned way DOWN as we have talked about previously- - but maybe we disguized our words.   We now come to Function.  We called Function in the past "Non volitional Karma" but I think the word "Event' instead of "Function" will clear things up better.  There is a definite relation between Events and Time.  Time gives RELEVENCE to Events.  It makes then Real.  On the other hand Events give time MARKET VALUE.  Because Time filled with many Events is worth a lot more on the market than time filled with few events.  Let me close with just one thing I've been hearing on the radio lately.  We hear about people speaking out or protesting a political Issue "Ahead of the polls" or "ahead of the learning curve".  The problem is if you are TOO far out in front of the learning curve- - Odds of Failure rise with (dare I say it) Exponential Speed.  But here is Advice for the Wise.  When you speak of an Event that you are approaching - - ahead of you on the Learning Curve- - speak of the event in slow and cautious terms - - and take it in small bites so that the people can accept it and process it as though it were a normal thing.  If you take the people at a slow and cautious enough tempo they Will accept Said Event as Normal and proper.  After the event has come to pass and you speak of this event After the learning curve on the other down side of the curve so to speak- - you may now and are in fact encouraged to speak much faster and more sweeping terms and do not fear to make your speech complicated with hidden meanings, because with the collective experiance of this crowd they for the most part will nave no problem Tracking with your Words.

There is Defining Things and There Is Defining Things

This is Thursday March 28th and I just finished dinner.  We had barbecued chicken with baked beans and corn with lemon pudding for desert.  I got seconds on the beans and a little chicken from Dora, even though our table was at the end of the line.  Tonight is the Last Supper in Christian lands, which is the closest thing we Christians have to Passover.  We Christians of the Protestent perswasion use the empty cross and not the Crucifix because we don't believe in transsubstantion- - or re enacting the breaking of the body of Christ every time mass is said.  One of the residents around here with seemingly a lot of money to throw around invited a bunch of us out for a decent lunch at one of the local resturants.  I've been getting extra food from unexpected sources lately and hopefully that means that I have gained some weight.

I checked out World Net Daily for the first time in months.  They are now a lot more video intensive than they used to be.  I watched a video on the Twelfth Iman- - which is the Messiah figure in Shiite Islam.  Apparently the notion that Satan is rallying his forces into some sort of a unified push is given support because Akmadenijab or Iran recently praised the now deceast Hugh Chavaz because it was his hope that on the resurrection that Chavez would be there with the Twelfth Imam, who is expected to do many signs and wonders and sway masses of people, and if it were possible, even the Elect.  The speaker went on to talk about how at Armageddon it would be Russia allied with Iran and Lybia attacking Israel from the North but by then Syria would no longer exist as a nation, which is an interesting prediction you can now make for the next headline, and Syria's non existance soon is not out of the realm of possability, one way or another.  Of course it seems to be a strictly Shiite attack.  They are the messianic ones, because Saudi Arabia and Iraq are not on the list of enemies to fear.

Nicole Sandler got her knickers in a twist all over Pat Robertson's remark about this woman who wanted to marry a man but she wanted him to accept her three adopted children, that are all from different countries.  As Pat Robertson said you never know what is in their past - - and we all can't be Superman to take a shot in the dark to marry a woman not knowing all we're in for.  But Nicole Sandler accused Pat Robertson of being a racist or something.  We are reminded that the gun lobby is alive and well and that there are other videos on the Right stating that there "all sorts of guns and munitions being stockpiled by the Homeland Security Department to attack the citizens with, and so I guess when they come at us with all the power of the US government- - somehow a few AK 47's will take care of the problem.  There is another story about vigelante Police patroling various beaches because they stop people on the way to the beach and check for drugs pointing guns at them and everything.  This vigelante group (like the Guardian Angels, I guess) are not above gunning down police officers should they get in the way.  But they are saying "We're trying to prevent drug deals that happen on these beaches".  For all I know maybe this story was in some other country.  It kind of sounds like it.  Ted Nugent is saying that the country would be better off is the South had won the Civil War.  There are times when I myself think Blacks would have been better off.  Moe Kelly pointed out that Abolitionists regarded the end of the institution of slavery as their goal.  Because even Lincoln was quoted that he can't say one way or the other whether Blacks are inferior to Whites, or not.  But the point is they weren't interested in what happened to Black people after they were freed.  I guess the President was making more anti gun speeches today.  And there is more anger at Majority Leader Harry Reed because he did not eliminate the fillibuster or three-fifths rule, when he had the option of doing that at the beginning of this year.  Because now we may not get any gun bill at all, not even a straw trader plrovision at gun shows or a background check.  And now Mario Rubio has lended his support to the movement of Republicans in the Senate to fillibuster any and all gun bills.  I keep hearing new stories every day to what nutty fringe extreme the Other Side is going to- - and that they are losing the support of the American People.  But nothing is showing up in legislation yet, anywhere.  Many of these major State Governments in the Midwest are in the firm grip of a reactionary government.

Moe Kelly's program this morning is well worth replaying.  He interviewed this Reverand Dion why who has his theological act together in a way I have rarely seen.  After all Adam and Eve weren't entitled to get various government tax benefits when they came together.  And a divinely sanctioned marriage could hardly include a woman on her fourth or fifth husband, could it?  Also it was noted that when you get married you can either go to a minister or priest, or a justice of the peace.  But when you get a Divorce, the Church won't perform that.  You have to go to a secular government to get unspliced.  So it can be noted that the secular government appears to have hegemeny here.  Every ceremony says "By the authority granted me by the State of California".  Moe Kelly noted that many gay people given a choice wouldn't care to be married anyhow, and some people who now endorse gay marriage like Hollywood Celebreties- - don't even LIKE gays- but it's the politically sheek thing to do to boost record or video sales or what have you, and their agent tells them to do it.  People want the tax advantages- - and there are eleven hundred of them - - that come along with the Christmas packages that comes with being married.  Moe Kelly points out that the whole red ribbon fad with AIDS was the same way, and there came a point where it was no longer fashionable to wear those red ribbons any more.  It was also noted that MEN generally led the Black civil right's movement and nobody fifty years ago even questioned this.  After all that's what men did.  Men took the initiative and led, and most likely their women wouldn't have it any other way.  There is a basic social coservatism in the Black community where the whole idea of gay marriage is a little nonsensical.  Moe Kelly points out that I am not the only one out here in radio land that doesn't regard Gay Marriage as any advancement of my personal civil liberties or rights.

Stay tuned.  The Opus Magnum is yet to come.  I had a nice little conversation with Jim Morrison this morning and he said a lot of interesting stuff.  He takes on the rather literal Biblical definition of marriage that he be of opposite sexes but need not necessarily be monogamus, but that polygamy is allowed.  And he explained why in geometric terms.  For instance we know that two points DEFINE a line and that three points DEFINE a plane and four points DEFINE a volume.  In other words, they lay out the peramaters of said Line or Plane or Volume.  But for instance the area emcompassed by a four dimensional entity could not be called a Volume, because the term Volume denotes three dimensional items in the same way that Marriage is something you have that denotes two sexes and not one sex or three sexes.  It states that for instance that two dots define a LINE.  But is the LINE limited by just these two dots and two dots only?  No  ANY other dot may form as a part of that LINE as long as it conforms to the peramaters of those first two dots.  In the same way the Bible says a man may have more than one wife- - assuming that he is able to "maintain" the relationship with his first wife.  In like manner a plane can have many more than three dots as long as the other dots are "co pleanear".  Many now claim that what the homosexual community really wants is all the Perks of Marriage- much more than they regard the Institution of Marriage Itself.  (Selah)  In Captain Piccard's words dealing with Moriarity- - "I need to find him a way of giving him what he wants without giving him what he wants".  I wish there were some way we Democrats could do THAT with the Republicans.  Give them something they have been claiming to Want- - and yet something that will cost us little.  (Selah)  So we know that four lines will define a Volume.  What will Five lines define?  But Jim Morrison points out that four points only define a Volume within a common time frame.  Otherwise you are left with not a volume but a mere surface area and some as yet Unspecified denotion of Time.  (Selah)  So the thing is that to describe ANYTHING- - - in the macro sense  - - you need Five - - points.  Which isn't just a city in southern California.  Five points will define anything.  Mal Evans told Jim that the Five means you have three of space and two of Time.  But this is not exactly the case.  Because unlike our geometric line where you need TWO points to define it- - with Time you only need ONE point to define it- - one point along a circle or possibly along a sphere surface.  "It really doesn't make any difference, Jim says.  It's all about how Compilcated you want to make it for yourself.  Because you can't really have Two dimensions of Time because Time lines never cross and as such never interact with each other.  Instead each one is "an actor out alone" in an exestential state of sequestration or Isolation from any other line.  Only in our hypothetical Circle do we find a common measurement and we use this circle to denote an equal "Advancement' line in whatever (completely independant) type system.  But according to Jim Morrison- - ALL universes in whatever time line are three dimensional because "That's way the chips are designed to fall".  (Presumably Designed by God)  So what you have here is not a two and three relation but a four and one relation.  But then I raised the idea of "How do you know which one of these hypothetical points in some (higher demensional?) space void out there- - how do you know Which one of these five dots represent Time.  Jim says "It doesn't really matter because time and space and mass function all as a unit and with one you get all the others."   And then I said "So you could have five identical dots and say This one rather than That one represented Time and so what would happen?"  Jim said, "There you go, now you're catching on!"  I go "Catching on to WHAT?  And Jim left me to ponder this.  I thought about it.  If Time dots and Space does are indistinguishable in this hyperspace or whatever Void out there- - then it would seem that a different dot would be a Different time line- - and that - - since Time is a radius from a point you only need one DOT or POINT to know exactly where you are- - the way Bees in a hive "point' in one direction to show where the flower for the nectar is.  But is another Dot of the five were Time than the spacial perameters of the other dots would define a different space- - and the whole thing would be on some other Time Line.  Time is straight but the cross grid points would be perpendicular only at that instant- like base E is with exponents.  If you try to go latteral at this line it HAS to be curved in order to keep equal distance from the Big Bang Origen of the whole Shabang.   I did remember one thing that Jim told me.  He said that IT COULD WELL BE THAT ALL OF THE MATTER IS IN ALL OF THE UNIVERSES AT THE SAME TIME THAT WE ALL VIEW THE SAME MATTER BUT THAT THE TIME FACTOR CAUSES WHAT YOU COULD CALL AN "ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT" IN THAT IT'S MERELY THE DIMENSION WE ARE VIEWING SAID MATTER FROM THAT MAKES IT APPEAR DIFFERENT.  Mal Evans told me last week that the Psychic Funnel in Karmic Space would be the Portal by which we enter that given person's Physical World, or at least His view of it.  But he hasn't proved this one yet.  HAGO UN FELIS DESPUES DE ZOA PRESENTE  (I probably murdered that!)

83 Year Old Woman Seeks Day of Justice

Today they were interviewing all the people congragated on the Supreme Court grounds.  The litigant in this defense of marriage law case is an 83 year old woman who was in a lezbian relationship with another woman for 44 years and in 2007 she was officially married in one of the states that allows same sex marriage.  But when her partner died she left her estate worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to the surviving partner.  But the partner had to pay mountains of Estate tax she would not have had to pay if her marriage had been recognized as legal by the United States government.  That to me seems a reasonable motive to bring a legal case.  Justice Ginsberg said there were 'whole marriages' and what she referred to as "skim milk marriages" and I believe it was Justice Kagen who inquired just what prompted the law to be enacted by the republican congress.  She found out that the Republicans then in congress "wanted to make a moral statement recognizing the Judeo Christian values of our land and to stem the tide of immorality" and what have you.  Some justices questioned whether this was a valid ground on which to base a Federal law in a new area it had not formerly legeslated in.  This was a longer Court session than yesterday but I was able to understand less of it because it contained a high ammount of legaleze- and lots of technical wrangeling.

Ashley Judd tweeted late today saying she would not run for Senator in Kentucky against Senate majority Mitch Mc Conell.  That's too bad because she almost certainly would have won.  The republicans were already running attack ads against her.  Ashley Judd stated that she wanted and needed to spend more time with her family.  I don't know.  To me this seems to be an awfully quick turn-around of oppinion and I can't help wonder what pressures were brought to bear on her decision making process.  Dorthy Hammil will not be performing on "Dancing with the Stars" or whatever, because she has physical problems and her orthopedist is advising against exaserbating any comditions.  Meta World Peace will not be playing in any more Laker games this season because he has a torn miniscus (?) that needs to be worked on.  I wish I knew what that was.  The leader of South Korea has announced that they have taken out the one of original four remaining "hot lines' to South Korea for the reason that, "Since there is going to be a War soon it seems the logical thing to do".  I guess this kind of leaves the rest of the world hanging as to what he has in store.   And they are apparently making "real progress" on that invisibility shield thing.  The Romulans had that one perfected centuries ago but they aren't telling anybody how they did it.

Sometimes there is a danger of either "over thinking something' or else getting a little TMI or too much information all at one time, and you aren't able to assimilate it all.  This guy on You Tube- - the Higgs Boson guy is guilty of just this because he's trying to make this 'expansion of the universe" thing more complicated than it in fact is- - because he says the math doesn't add up and so there must be another- - strictly hypothical anti energy field presumably made up of anti bosons- - that counteract its effects, kind of like a giant cosmic electronic resister.  Allow me to come to the rescue right now.  You know of course that- - the speed of Expansion of any Universe need not be restricted to the speed of Light but can and does proceed at a much faster rate.  Sure the Higgs boson creates Space at a break-neck pace- - but let's back up to an example we know a little better, and that is Black Holes.  We know here that space is "Sequestered" into what Would be a Finite Space- - that is - - IF it could be seen at all, which it can't.  But if it could it would be kind of self limiting- - just like Romney says immigrants would exercise "self deportation".  That is- - to put it in plain terms- - as measured from what we would call our so called REAL vantage point- - the Higgs boson concentration becomes increasingly concentrated.  The further you go in a radius out from Ground Zero- - the more concentrated the bosons - - and so time appears to pass more quickly with reference to activity- - and space shrinks down to Nothing but to these people swimming in Higgs bosons up to their eyeballs- - everything still seems quite normal.  And from our so called REAL vantage point once again- there is no reason why their universe could not keep ON expanding.  Keep in mind too that we assume that if we look at something four or five Billion years old and it's one third the speed of light- - we make the leap that the Universe is twelve or thirteen Billion years old.  But the universe does not "end" the moment the light no longer hits us- even if that day were to arrive.  Indeed would get the hyperbolic mirroring effect- - so we would see images we've seen before- - and I expect THIS to be the next great headline in the astronomy news.  We'll see these ghost images rather than what's actually out there beyond the event horizon.  Let me just say something about the idea that time was "slightly curved" and not totally straight.  I think I would like to retract that statement because aspects of it just aren't working out.  This entire Cosmic Sling-shot theory presupposes laws of astro physics that weren't in force when I am saying that it took place and therefore to use this theory is overly extrapelative and speculative.  So what we are left with is the cosmic firecracker approach where matter explodes out in a host of undefined and new dimensions- - which we usually show on a two dimensional star-burst model.  This theory dates back to the early eighties with me and Mark.  I'm not ready to abandon it.  The idea here is that each of manifold time-lines - - - "chooses from the ever varied pool of probabilities and contingencies".  We say "Anything that CAN happen HAS happened - - in Some Universe".  It could be likened to the statue of David or somebody.  You "Create it" by taking away and not adding to the Clay.  The Clay is "Everything there is" and I have no idea what THAT consists of.  (Selah)

The soap opera had a lot of key and varied conversations.  It all seems to be leading to “something” but I’ve been thinking that for weeks, and somehow the whole thing never quite seems to get to any plot resolution.  The thing is that Nick has all of the Hortons against him plus the Di Miras and the Kiriacus household, so one might say he is vastly outnumbered and therefore needs to muster any weapons at his disposal.  But others will still whine it’s still not a “fair fight” because if you have merit and the Truth on your side it is somehow “Not a fair fight’ or “mean spirited’ or all of that stuff they were accusing Joseph Biden of during last years presidential debate.  I still have just a little of the Arabica beans left- and about half of the content remains to be used now.  Hopefully the other seven ounces will last me through the weekend, which I doubt.  Dennis was talking about moving to another facility but they jacked up the asking price on him by twenty dollars when they saw he was interested.  So he’ll stay here.   The cleaning staff has been relatively passive and not activist.  I haven’t seen Nora around this week.

Round Two of Supreme Court Action on Wednesday

Sometimes people may be "playing to a certain audience".  There were a lot of gay people in the courtroom today who have waited years for this day.  It was an emotional thing for them actually.  Many say that partial rights are like being called a "citizen" meaning perhaps there is ID you can show for work, or not to be thrown out of the country, but you can't Vote and if you travel to another foreign country you can't contact the US Embassy should you get into trouble with the local authorities.  Lest you think this is hypothetical., Rush Limbaugh even said on his show a few weeks ago "I have no problem with all the illegals being able to stay in this country- - if they can't Vote for 25 years".  Some of these immigration "paths" would seem to do just that.  At least Pat Buchannon is consistent.  He's against illegals because they drive the wage base down and take away jobs from Americans, but also talks about "The English culture being undermined".  Some tea party people are the worst of posers and hypocrites on both the immigration and gay issues.  They aren't personally against either.  In fact they rather like the idea of all that cheap immigrent labor with their "guest worker' permit, because it drives the wage base down and increases corporate profits.  Rush Limbaugh came out and attacked the President's position on gay marriage, not because he was against it himself but he says "What Obama said was Political because it does nothing for the gay community".  Mitt Romney was all for the gays and abortions- - before he was against them.  Today much of the time was spent in determining whether the parties even had legal standing.  Justices wondered why private citizens rather than the State of California was bringing the suit.  I guess it was Scelia who asked the pointed question that never got answered as to "At just what Point did banning gay marriage become unconstitutional".  Justice Ginsburg statred that citing a case from 1971 would not be allowed even though it fit perfectly because 'At this time the court had not even - - Legeslated-  on gender neutral principles", which would be a valid line of argument if the court were in the business of making new laws instead of ajuticating old ones.  This 1971 case stated that there is no possible constitutional principle that could be raised in Marriage laws (presumably because the subject is never even mentioned in the United States Constitution).  Tomorrow they do the whole thing over on the defense of Marriage act signed by President Clinton in1996.  The key thing here- - is whether the government has the authority to pass a law in an area where "The US Congress has no jurisdiction" because once again, Marriage is an issue for the States, and arguably improper for the US congress to even weigh in on this issue.  But I understand why Clinton had to allow it because his back was up against the wall as we discussed a few weeks ago.  Personally I think the whole Defense of Marriage statute is on weaker legal ground than is Proposition Eight passed here in California in 2008.

David Cruise talked about what animals or zoo monkeys the students in the Santa Ana school system are.  They are really out of control.  They know they will not be hit or manhandled by the teachers, and they seldom use corporal punishment now.  Instead the students openly taunt and threaten the teachers "You know I have the ability to get you Fired" no doubt alluding to all this sexual stuff out now.  If it were me I'd declare a "restraint holiday" for teachers meaning they could use whatever physical force they regarded as necessary to enforce order in the classroom.  They would be just like the Cops these students will be destined to meet on the street if they are expelled.  And I'd highly suggest these trouble students be expelled because they aren't good for anybody in the classroom.  Try and give a police officer the same sort of Crap you give teachers at school and see how far you get.  My guess is that if they called such a ban on prohibitions against teachers using sumary physical force, you'd see the most amazing drop in crime and disruption in the classrooms and grades would go up because the other students would at last have an oppertunity to learn.  That's my view on this matter, anyhow.

There is a counter intuitive bit of medical care news tonight.  A few years ago there was a major movement to shorten up the shifts of hospital orderlies and the like- - care givers for hospital patients.  But now though shifts are much shorter the quality of care has gone down because of the "information hand off" problem or that game of "telephone' gone wrong where the information goes through twice as many hand offs now and in more hands- and any one of them might get it wrong.  They featured a seventeen year old computer genious, who got his first C Programming for Dummies book when he was Twelve.  I've read that one, but I never became famous.  In terms of the expanding Universe, the reason why "gravity won't eventually pull it all back together" is because now it's not just an expanding vacuum - - but that vacuum actually has an energy of its own, which accelerates the already rapid expanding rate of the Universe.  They now have some device for cleaning a dog's tongue where all of the bad breath germs reside.  There is this bristle brush thing with some flavoring on it that the dog licks and thus it cleans its tongue.   Gay couples in California already have the right to adopt children, so the legislature obviously didn't listen to Dennis Prager on this issue.  I suppose that if they should discover that children of gay couples are actually better adjusted than the control group, this would be Another of those counter intuitive things.  Tough break for Amanda Knox being put in Double Jeopardy by the Italian government.  That's what happens when you don't have a constitution that safeguards rights.  Just don't ever go back there.

Just in case you were wondering, we haven't forgotten about astrologically indicated possible "Rapture of the faithful" date, which will be Thursday April 11, or two days before Stephanie's sexy liberal tour in Chicago on Saturday the thirteenth.  So far there is no indication of any "economic misstep" that some were predicting.  I'd be just as happy if none of these dire predictions came to pass.

Stating Things In Other Words

Today in less than an hour the Supreme Court is going to be hearing oral arguments on the gay issue.  I suppose that's better than Rectal Arguments.  That is at ten o clock for us late risers here on the west coast.  In terms of New York time I slept in and didn't get up till eight thirty and was able to only catch a half an hour of Bill Press.  Sometimes the other side can make what I would regard as sound statements with valid conclusions.  For instance- - it's been pointed out that Churches perform weddings, but States perform Marriages.  In every single ceremony you'll hear you'll hear the words "By the authority granted me by the State of California".  Now in these "shotgun weddings' back in the hills- - I don't know what they do.  My understanding is they'd just drag the poor guy in front of a preacher and perform the ceremony.  Churches perform weddings, but States legitimize marriages.  Someone else talked about how if it's not our place to Judge anybody and that it's God alone who judges- - then we should wait for God to weigh in on the issue, and if God Himself declines to weigh in on the issue as somehow important or significant to him, then who are we to judged?  I have used this same argument Myself- - though not on this issue.  Of course I'll remind you that it says "Do not Judge", which is not the same is You must Acquit".  It would be just as wrong for me to Forgive the sins of a mass murderer, for instance, as it would be for me to Judge someone when God himself has not judged him.  These are just things in logic we need to be aware of.

This morning I watched that You Tube video on the Hicks Boson particle.  The speaker has a nack for stating things in terms ordenary people can understand without unduly taxing their brains.  First it's matter of smashing things.  And when you've smashed things into as small a component as possible with the implement you have you may say "Well, that's it".  Till the day when someone comes along with a better smasher.  It used to be the molicule was seen as the undividable unit.  Then it was the Atom.  For a long time it was the basic atomic particles of electrons, protons  and newtrons.  But then in 1964 we enter the realm of the sub atomic particle.  It seems that there are other broad types of subatomic particles other than quarks and leptons.  It would seem that the boson is a basic type of particle, and the Hicks boson is a specific type of boson.  I'd like to get off message here for just a bit to talk about the distinction between "Special" and "General" as I define these words.  I believe in Special Grace, but not General Grace.  Another word for special would be specific- - or here's something out of Catholic theology - - - Accidental.  I believe in accidental grace the same way I believe a person can overcome the one in a million odds and win the Power Ball lotterey seven times- - as is claimed happened.  If they say it happened, then it happened.  But it is an - - say it with me- - an Accident.  It is a specific and isolated event.  It is as it were a snapshot in Time.  But what theologians need to beware of is the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle.  OK I'll get off that high horse for now.  My point is that I believe in specific Grace- - from God- - but I don't believe in General Grace from God.  Because if you generalize something it become an  - - say it with me- - an Entitlement.  And grace is something we are not - - Entitled to.  It's something we don't deserve and didn't earn, just as- - finding a broken down ice cream truck on a mountain hill with lots of good ice cream just there for the taking- - is something we Didn't Earn and don't deserve- - or being Raped is something we didn't earn and nobody deserves.  Therefore to base a Religion on an Accident- - - to me is an oxy moronism.  They always say that "God isn't an Accident' or however it goes.  And yet they take the accidental- - and generalize it into some kind of a moral mandate, or moral test that they've passed- - and you never will because it's their job always to remain in control over you - - (otherwise they'd be out of work) (Selah)

OK let's do take two right now.  Anyhow- - - we were talking about sub atomic particles.  And we are informed by the speaker that the whole catalog of sub atomic particles fits together in a marvelous, grand puzzle with certain theories - - were one to look at the whole- - which haven't been proved yet but are Out There to BE Proved.  (Selah)  One of them is the existance of the Hicks Boson or whatever.  Then the speaker began talking about various forces.  He talked about magnetic force- - of the earth.  We know how magnatism affects things electrically and charge wise.  There are radio waves- - and there is also particle energy called photons- - which are a different form of energy.  But somehow "If we could turn it all off" and get on some other planet without radio waves or a magnetic field- - then we'd at last have peace, with nothing in our Vacuum - - except nothingness.  But after you have "turned off everything' there is something you can't turn off and that is this Hicks-boson machine- - or field energy contained in the vacuum.   Keep in mind that Albert Einstein is on the losing side of this issue and I am on the winning side because I have always or for a long time believed in some sort of Ether- - as a logical deduction of wave propigation.  You readers of mine know this.  So where are they looking for these particles.  There is this giant partical accelerator in Geneva Switzerland or whereever that is a fifteen foot circle.  And they were colliding electrons and positrons- - which of course would normally produce - - photons.  But these particles weren't heavy enough to produce the proper "ripple' in the boson field they were looking for.  (I am even now not entirely sure what specific thing or Sign they were looking for amidst the mountains of data that they analyzed afterward)  But they had to refurbish this big cyclotron and so they moved to a smaller one in the United States that was still oppertive.  But before they closed the big one down in Europe- - late last summer they finally found what they were looking for, and I guess in going through more data- - they found more confirmation of the Hicks boson- - just in the past few weeks.  We don't have to wait four more years.

OK I guess we'll call this take three.  Some of you are saying to me "OK, but how does all this affect the price of tea in China?  How is it relative to my life".  I'll tell you.  Because it could be that is we turn off this whole "boson apperatus' of space- - we can "shut down" gravity and mass as we know it.  Hence, we will have been well on our way to inventing the fabled Warp Drive of Star Trek fame.  According to the speaker, if there were no boson field in empty space- - then everything would move through space- - at Infinite speed because there would be nothing to slow it down.   He spoke of how electrons travel the speed of light.  My view is that were the boson field shut down or "turned off" then light speed itself would be no limitation because as I myself have argued- - it's the Ether that itself limits light propigation to its present speed.  But more than that- - mass and Time given the relation they have- - there would be no Time.  Time would not Pass.  I say that because the speaker then goes on to say "There was a period when the Hicks boson apperatus was not yet switched on.  But he says it took place "Pico seconds after the original Big Bang".  That's not much time.  A pico second is a trillionth of a second.  Back at Golden West they used to talk about pico-ferads in condenser microphones, or capacatents microphones.  So this would suggest to me that Time as we know it- - did not proceed or progress- - in that early era- - so that there is no way of even properly Measuring the era.  It also harkens back to my recent theory of only a few weeks ago- - that there were Causes and Events long ago that were not "In time" but were all acrambled up and made no Sense, because there were not yet scientific laws to give them a "Template" or sense or order or pattern.  But rather than speak of the "God particle' that fills the Universe- - as this man does- - I then spoke of a "God Force" that hurled "Events" per see- - INTO some sort of forward Time Vortex.  I think were Bones or Jim Morrison to look at the You Tube theory they would say that the God particle- - itself is an Accident- - in which - - one can argue that All Time is in essence an Accident.  We need it to say "something happened".  But time itself - - can manifest itself- - Time need not manifest itself in only one Way.  This is what I think Bones would say about this.  In otherwise the adage of "Everything that CAN happen HAS happened is still intact".  (Selah)

Giving Up The Old Ways

 I know that smoking is on its way out.  They don't smoke in Movie scripts the way they used to even as short as a decade ago.  Someone said, "Only the bad guys smoke now".  Mayor Bloomberg and so many other cities are making their whole metropolises "smoke free zones" where you can't smoke at a baseball stadium or in a city park or the beach or so many other areas.  Smokers are becoming like the Jews under Nazi Germany with the noose slowly being tightened on them.  People who have cell phones are in a whole other socio economic status from me.  I couldn't begin to afford a cell phone and would have little use for most of their trivial devices or "Applications".  So how did we survive all these years without these.  Still despite the fact that people like me can't even count on enough to eat every day- - we are labeled pampered and priveleged and "entitled" by the Rich- - who see themselves as "victims of the government' who aren't allowed to "unleash the US economy".   And then we have the whole gay marriage issue, which is a lot more age related than it is either economics or even politics related.  I can't see myself as ever accepting gay marriage.  If I'm a Christian I have to follow the Golden Rule.  So I have to ask myself "Would I personally have liked it as a kid if I learned I was the only kid raised exclusively by either two fathers or two mothers?  No.  I thank God I wasn't subjected to that.  I wouldn't like it one bit.  So why in the name of God should I seek to impose that on any other kid or even those yet to be born?  I don't know what kind of homosexual indoctrination is going on in the classrooms these days in kindergarten or in the early grade school years.  All I know is they used to have that book "Heather has two Mommies".   And the people are already gathering on the Supreme Court grounds like vultures awaiting the decision.  Of course often these Justices play Devil's Advocate, so you can't tell from the audio course of the Arguments they often carry on the internet the same day.  I thought it was a slam dunk for the conservatives in the whole Insurance Mandate case last June.  Who can forget the brocolli argument?  "Should therefore the government mandate that your buy brocolli at the grocery store?"  From my vantage point it appeared the pro Obama crowd fell flat on it's ass.  But in June we were all surprised and a little stunned.  How apparently Justice Roberts is inviting some of his gay relatives to watch the proceedings, as if this some sort of Cue in Advance.

Well here is is with Passover due to start in an hour or so and the nation's heartland is still in the grip of a winter snow storm.  Even people who are used to the cold weather are getting a little fed up with it and would like to see the green growth of spring.  Personally I think people feel the same way about this economy.  Money wise, the screws were tightened again on me this month when they increased my medical co-pay.  It seems like the same news keeps getting cycled and recycled over and over again.  Now here is the view as things were last Friday. - - - I didn’t like the attitude of this guy on KTLK because he is too eager to excuse the child molesting priests and wonders why the media even mentions it but wonders why the media just didn’t focus on the charity work done by the Catholic Church.  He quoted an author who said it’s all the fault of the Vatican II council that came out in early 1965 that reformed the form of the Mass.  He says at that time they changed the instruction in all the semenaries to include radical sixties liberal type instruction that openly advocated gay priests and gay nuns.  Suffice it to say- I don’t need to say what garbage that is.  And he wants us to swallow it.  It seems as if congress is going to ignore the debt ceiling crisis and not approve a budget, but instead make it a priority to go on Easter vacation.  Like one female from Founders said, “Sometimes the last thing you WANT to do is the first thing you SHOULD do”.  But Tuesday’s Supreme Court arguments haven’t been canceled and people are already camping out on the court grounds.  That brings us to Sunny on "Days of our Lives".  He obviously knows his manhood is threatened so now he’s a Violent- - Faggot, attacking Nick without cause perhaps trying to get Nick in trouble with his parole officer if he fights back too spiritedly.  OK he's not your garden variety faggot who screws around with countless one-nighters with partners he doesn't tell Will about - - - picking up God only knows what kind of Sexual Transmitted Disease -  - - he's an Angry - - loud-mouth faggot.  It bothers me that the one normal person on that soap opera, the one who is actually acting responsably, the one who has faced up to his faults,  who isn't screwing around with a lover who used to be his or her mortal enemy two months earlier - - the one who isn't tied to his parent's apron strings or who will be bailed out by Daddy's money if they should fall on hard times.  The one who doesn't think his sperm is special because of his family's last name.  HE is the one person on the series who is the most roundly villified by everybody else.  “You can’t keep me and Will from raising your wife’s baby.  Why do you think you are?”  He thinks he’s husband and father to be.  And he is correct.  I think Clowie has had enough of half way measures and plans to murder Jenifer, as if that will make Daniel love her.  Is she completely batty?  They say that the usual bright flowers are not blooming in the local deserts this year.  The sap is not flowing in Vermont as it usually is by now, and the cherry blossoms will be late this year in the nation’s Capital.  

There are sometimes you run into a total jackass, even if they're on TV.  There is that guy on NBC  at three offering dating advice to women that I'll pretty much guarentee will lead to disaster.  He suggests when a woman gets to know a man - - - in a bar or someplace, ask him questions he HAS to lie about, because he knows if he doesn't the conversation will end right there.  Tip:  Never put the man in a position where he has to lie.  Because it's kind of like a drill sergeant barking orders to a recruit.  The recruit has no choice but to bark orders right back, "Sir, yes sir!"   Apparently before the relationship goes anywhere at all even at first contact, ask the man what his prospects are for the near future, and then ask him about his line time aspirations.  And then ask him how well he gets along with his family.  While you're at at it you might as well ask him what the diameter of his penis is both erect and regular.  This host appeals to an impossible standard I doubt even the host himself was able to live up to when he was younger.  The host states, "It's not at all improper to ask the man how much money he makes on the first encounter".  Saturday night Bill on his own turned it to “Cops” and we watched it for the hour.  There was a segment on a prostitute in Las Vegas and the arresting cop didn’t have zippidy-doo-dah to base any arrest for solicitation on, but he kept saying “Stop lying to me’ when the woman never varied from her story.  With the police the fourth and fifth amendments to the constitution are non existant, don’t you know.  Same difference you know.  If you are of a paranoid mind set of "everyone's out to get me" you're going to assume the worst.  Sharks attacked that guy in the under water cage because they smelled blood and went into a feeding frenzy.  Just like when cops begin firing their guns based on as irrational of cues as the shark,  they go into a gun firing frenzy unill they have emptied their guns.  You know these women may find husbands who earn a lot of money.  But I'lll betr you dollars to donuts their sex life will be nowhere.  Worse than that their worst fears will come upon them because their husbands will spend their evenings with "A woman who really understands them"  (Selah)

Engrams are different from ideas.  Engrams are by nature neither true nor false in and of themselves.  But ideas based on knowledge- - are true and redeeming. The difference between Knowledge and Wisdom is that Wisdom if often laden with moral imperatives and injunctions more than actual information.  You can learn knowledge from others, but you generally have to acquire Wisdom on your own.  Knowledge is Truth and the Truth will make you Free.  Christian pastors don’t want you to be Free but bound, and so they are almost devoid of real Truth.  If you form a Belief about God based on something they said in an attempt to think “OK, I’ve actually learned something” then they will shoot you down later when a crisis comes and tell you “God doesn’t deal with people that way” or “God isn’t like that”.  What they have done is taken a chain of cause and effect you thought you could rely on and just broken it.  So you are back to square one.  I don’t have squat any more.  You had believed a person “stood for something” but now you know they don’t stand for anything.  If you are in auto shop and the instructor tells you “That part won’t fit” you know you now have to back up a step as if you hadn’t taken the last one, and you are again faced with the problem of which part DOES fit?”.   When someone says “I want you to share some of your ideas with me” such as an employee being called into an executive’s office- - what he means is that “I want you to share your knowledge with me”.  Or in the words of Gordon Gecko, “Tell me something I don’t know”.  But both ideas and engrams seem to at times “have a life of their own” and a Season of their own, when their Time has come.  But nobody is calling these engrams or moral injunctions or imperatives as “sensient”.  It could be argued that the Superego is what we as people are evolving into.  It is the idealized self that looks back at the end of our lives and tells us what we did wrong in the past.  The ego is of a limited perception that doesn’t “know all the facts” and thus is flawed in its judgements.  People have certain “core beliefs” in my opinion.  Even though the circumstances of my life have changed over the years there is a certain moral consistency and pattern to my judgements and interactions and value judgements of the past.  I am not ashamed of these.  All I’m saying is that I can’t be judged on what I didn’t know at the time.  It can be said that the strongest friendships are held together through a sharing of common values- - or even prejudices.  It’s these common values that enable to put yourself in the other person’s position and “see things from his point of view”.  Sometimes when you’re reading up on a person’s life you read certain passages with a focus and intensity- - as if to soak up every word because for some reason known only to your Soul, you deem certain passages as much more important, than you view other passages.  It’s as though you’ve read things and say “this has actually happened- - and I need to refresh myself about the facts” even though it’s in the life of some individual you’ve never even met.