I
have only heard one reference to the release of all that Kennedy assassination material
they’ve been storing for 54 years, and then they said the material would be
released later today. I’m wondering
when Robert Muller is going to release all of his findings on the Trump
administration he’s gathered over the past year. Hopefully he’s acquired a lot of good
information from now. The good news is
that Muller hasn’t been fired yet and this wasn’t a foregone conclusion. They are running those ads on the TV now
saying for you the viewer to write or call your congressman about getting going
on this impeachment move that seems hopelessly stalled. I think I’ve seen one suggestion of charges
to levy against President Trump from Washington’s blog or somewhere. One day they had reasons to get rid of trump,
and then by another of their writers, reasons why we must keep Donald Trump as
president. I’m of the school of thought
that says we need to get rid of Trump as soon as possible because I do believe
he is psychologically unfit for office.
He brags that he’s gone to all of these Ivy League schools and
presumably has passed a lot of mentally challenging courses and thus is a “well
rounded college grad”. But he doesn’t
talk like one. He talks like a truck
driver who dropped out of high school.
Sometimes using simple words can be a plus in getting your point across,
but Trump has carried this simplistic crudity way too far. He has not only lowered the bar but I think
the bar hit him on the head on the way down.
But Bannon should keep on talking about this vast number of “establishment
Republicans who are dead set against this President. He’s singing the liberals’ song. It’s just a few isolated Trump in the administration
who believe that the majority of Republicans are basically behind him.
The
Rev Chuck Smith used to talk about a mystery of science nobody has been able to
solve. We all learned that the nucleus of
the atom is made up of protons and neutrons with electrons going around. Chuck asks,
why don’t all of those positively charged electrons fly off in all
directions and end up destroying all matter in the Universe? Science has come up with an ad hoc answer of
a “strong force” whose sole purpose is to hold all these protons in their place
in the nucleus so they don’t go flying off.
These is another mystery of science.
This involves the universal expansion of the Universe seemingly going on
forever. Anywhere you are in this
universe, all you see are stars flying away from you. It’s known as “the red shift” just like the
voting machines in Ohio. Receding light
gets shifted to the left or “red” side. In
fact now they say that the rate of this expansion is constantly accelerating
and this expansion is now believed to exceed the speed of light, which is
something. Scientists say this can’t go
on forever but at some point the Universe will lack cohesion and dissolve. The writers of “The Priveleged Planet” go
further and say that earth HAS to be in a certain surrounding star density. They say in the direction of Sagittarius it’s
too “dense” for life because of some cosmic force there. My friends from the Federation told me the
same thing. There is also talk about “universal cooling”. (as opposed to global warming) So is it that the universe might just become “too
cold?” We then have another mystery
involving Black Holes. I am currently
of the school that once a Black Hole forms it drops out of this Universe and
can’t grow any more. It can’t continue
to roam through the Universe like a giant vacuum cleaner sucking out stars into
it. But now we have the question as to
what happens when two Black Holes collide.
This is said to have been observed happening a couple of weeks back,
though all you really see is an artist rendering of the event. Personally I don’t think scientists have ever
photographed a black hole let alone two of them colliding. This is where gravity waves have been
observed and hence is proof of their existence a century after Einstein
predicted that gravity came in waves.
But what happens “When Universes Collide”. It sounds like a good Sci Fi movie plot. Was
this Universe once a Black Hole? Does
the birth of a Universe coincide with the observance of a new Black Hole in the
mother universe? These are questions
that science would like to solve. We’re
always learning. I just wish we’d learn
at a faster pace.
Last night I watched the Dodgers and the Astros starting at the top
of the first inning. The Astros scored
first. Then the Dodgers tied it up at
one to one. The Dodgers scored two more
times in the sixth inning so it was 3 to 1.
Then in the eighth there was some bad fielding and the Astros made it
three to two. At this point it was just
after eight and I decided to watch “Riverdale” figuring the Dodgers were going
to win. But in the morning I learn that
the Astros won the game in “ one of the wildest games ever” and they showed a
chronology time-line and video clips of the game. The Astros tied it in the ninth making it 3
to 3. But then there was more scoring in
the tenth and eleventh innings and the Astros ended up winning the game 7 to
6. Bones told me that he was rooting
for the Astros this series. At the time
I figured the Astros would take one of the five games just like the Dodgers let
the A’s have a game in 1988 and won in five.
But then I talked to someone from the Federation who also said the Federation
was supporting the Astros. I still
didn’t take it seriously because my faith in the Federation is at a low ebb
these days. The Federation also fixed
it go the Giants would beat the Denver Broncos in a game that weekend, “just to
prove that they could do it”.
There is one issue in
finding truth that people often ignore and that’s the idea of simplicity. Now some say “The big lie” works because it’s
so far fetched and complicated that it just HAS to be true. But the simpler solution of course that “The
big lie” itself IS a lie. People won’t
allow themselves to believe that. One
Truth the left can peddle successfully is “The poor and minorities are getting
screwed”. That’s a one-liner that’s
succinct and I believe it’s accurate.
Some parents might tell their little boy or girl who asks “You were
created because your Mommy and Daddy love each other very much”. It’s accurate but only to a point and skirts
the main issue of sex. Others would say
that Creationism is a “simpler” doctrine then Evolution. Well, you can make evolution pretty succinct
by saying “Survival of the fittest”.
It’s not quite as “simple” as Genesis 1, but it’s close. Certainly the sun being the center of the
solar system is a simpler explanation on sight then the spiral looping theories
the Ptolomies had for centuries. The
doctrine of Christian salvation is simple, but it’s also, shall we say, “non
apparent”. That is there seems to be no
immediate evidence which we can see. For
this reason I don’t believe this explanation explains anything. In computer programming there are times when
you aren’t as succinct as you ought to be, you may use a lot of redundant
variables, or variables that can be reduced down to one variable. “Global warming” is a simple phrase. But people would rather deny the obvious than
believe it. I think too many people
don’t “look at where the clues are pointing” like that double impostor scenario
on Days of our Lives. They literally
deny what their senses are telling them.
There is a theory of classic
music that goes “A good symphonic composition will have this quality of
inevitability about it”. That is, that
it doesn’t have a “thrown together” quality but seems to be woven from a single
organic fabric.
No comments:
Post a Comment