A Legacy of Lies and Deception

One woman on impulse went fron the 78th floor of the World Trade Center to the 77th floor and missed the second plane hitting the building. That was just one floor. How many people would have been saved had not both buildings come down so soon? You know that the media that day had been stating as a virtual certain that both buildings would fall, and I for one could not believe that. I figured "Where would be no possible way of telling this soon". We know how both buildings fell quickly and decisively. We were and are repeatedly being told by the media how on this day we lost both your "innocence" and our sense of security. In fact we are led to believe somehow that the Bush administration was somehow sleeping and that 9 - 11 was an Awakening for him. That's a bullshit lie and we'll prove it. If Al Gore had been President that day, as he would have been had the will of the majority of US voters who cast ballots that day- - the history of America could be very different. We would have had that "lock box" on Social Security funds. Also that "Thin Thread" computer security problem would have been in opporation before Bush cancled the program. We were told that Al Qaeda was the farthest thing from President Bush's mind before 9 - 11. George W told us in the debates that he did not favor wars involving "police actions" or "nation building". That was a lie. We know he planned to go to war in Iraq all along. We know Bush was lying when he said "You need a court order to wiretap" when he had recently a few weeks earlier before that remark issued an executive orders bypassing the court order. We know from the Sixty Minutes segment that he KNEW there were no "weapons of mass destruction". We know that when Valerie P tried to expose the lie that a political vendetta was carried out against her. We know the political vendetta carried out against Donald Siegelman in Alabama. Yet after all this we don't believe that Bush could be guilty of government mass murder of a most blatent kind by blowing up the Twin Towers, perhaps setting the detonation points a week in advance. We know there is even stronger evidence that the Solomon Brothers building was a planned take down, and how the government planned to fabricate a cover story for this, too. There seems now overwhelming evidence that Flight 93 was shot down by a circling F 16 jet by our government. Yet many are slow to abandon this folk tale of how the passengers stormed the cockpit and overpowered the hijackers to deliberately crash the plane to save innocent lives. From every transcript of that flight I've heard it was the passengers who were afraid of crashing and not the hijackers. There is another story of how the Flight 93 hijackers tried to rock the plane to keep the passengers from getting up out of their seats and "something went wrong". We have the story of people who said it was the smaller F 16 they saw but how the F B I in "men in black" fashion told them what the "truth" was. We have the landing in Cleveland story for Flight 93. There is yet another story that President Bush gave the orders to shoot down Flight 93 but that the military decided to ignore these orders. If you could prove that one the implications would really be serious. We know that debris from Flight 93 was spread over an eight mile area. But one sight did say that they found over six hundred points of bones over that eight mile area. That would indicate that a lot of people did perish. When they show the site in Pennsylvania there is usually a plume of smoke in the air, and white smoke at that, as if someone could just have set off a smoke bomb for effect. We know the hole in the site is not nearly big enough to account for a 767 commercial jet. To believe one of the lies the government tells us would be a stretch, but we are asked to believe ALL of them. They had the three M's, means, motive, and oppertunity. And I stress Motive. In court if a witness as lied one or more times in the past, his testimony may be taken as suspect now. Many of these facts you have read before. It's important to look at all of them in totality, all at once. We knew the Bush Administration - - Chaney, Rumsfeld and the rest of them- - profited imensely from the Iraq War. So we have mental mind set, we have the means, and the oppertunity, and we have the results. And the worst part of all this is that President Obama has bought into this whole charade. As I said in a previous posting, if it turns out President Obama knew about government misdeeds and covered them up, he himself is guilty of being an accessary after the fact, and of obstruction of justice. This is clearly an impeachable offence, and as far as I'm concerned today would not be a bit too soon to take Action on this.

As the M C said at the "Tommy" concert- - "Allright, here we go!" Saturday morning I had this idea in my pursuit of illustrating the President's shortcomings to bring back the old British Live at the BBC broadcasts with Brian Matthews. The Show was called Saturday Club. And he would start his show by having a group ready to play and he asks the leader "Eric, you say the name of your group is to Protozoa?" Eric says "That's right. But we're hoping that our music will evolve" and Brian says "Then maybe you could call your group - - the Jellyfish". Eric: "Well, we're thinking about names". Brian says "How about The Animals?" and Eric says, "You know that's a good suggestion. I'm going to write that down." Brian Matthews then says "But first we know in this modern age that mental health is becomming an increasing problem in society. So in that vain we're having a special guest this morning, Dr. Bleishtaff, who is a graduate of the Vienna school of psychiatry." Matthews and Bleishtaff exchange small talk and Brian quips, "By the way, to you have to have an accent like that to be admitted?" and a bit later he says "Were you born with that accent, or was it the result of a childhood incident?" And then Bleishtaff says "It's German. Of course my parents spoke Yiddish". Brian says, "Is that related to Flemish?" "I really don't know" Brian: "Well it sounds like you need to clear your throat. Why don't you take a good hack into this dust bin here". After a while they get around to talking about self image and Bleishtaff brings up the hypothetical idea of America someday having a Black president and Brian goes "Well, they never thought they'd have a Catholic President and they've got one right now". And Bleishtaff says that it's possible for a childhood event to scar a child and damage his ego that affects him throughout all life. There are some events that cause a person to lose his - - er - - uh - - impitus." Brian, "You mean his Mojo. Our next guest knows a thing or two about that." Bleishtaff: "For instance the child may have asked his mother if he could have a chocolate bar and his mother refuses him because it's right before dinner. Then the boy asks "Mommy, can I have an Imaginary chocolate bar", and his mother agrees to that. From then on this Black man lives in his own world of imaginary accomplishments, and may refer often to these imaginary accomplishments in his addresses to the people - and all the while needed bills never get passed". Brian says, "Of course right now in America they are debating whether or not to have a civil rights bill. But we'v'e spent enough time on that. Now our group of the say is going to perform a song for us. What are you going to play for us?" Eric: We'd like to perform our hit that just hit number one on the hit parade yesterday called "Hacienda of the Setting Moon". "All right - - take it away". You know - - I have asked myself a lot in the past few days whether I should re think my dire assessment of Obama's address before the Joint session of Congress. I mean even Bill Press thinks it was a good speech causing me to go "Et tu, Bill?" Chris Matthews thinks it was a good speech. Thom Hartman thinks it was a good speech. I'm sure we've all encountered people for whom it's clear they don't know what they are doing. It could be a dentist. It could be a barber. We draw on prior experiances with with these professions to formulate an idea what standard is. Clearly the president could have talked about recinding the regulations about medicare not negotiating for the best drug prices, like the VA does. There was no talk of accelerating the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. There was no overt statement saying flat out "Corporations pay too Little in taxes today". As to Sarah Palin saying we should abolish all corporate taxes, this would only ammount to about a 7% drop in all revenues. Others want a "revenue neutral" program of tax reform. A revenue Positive plan would be much better. Michelle Bachman even proposed a plan worth considering in Wednesday night's debate. She spoke of the "Repatriotion of corporate funds overseas". And she said we could reduce corporate taxes to 20% and close the loopholes to make up the difference. To me this was a positive idea nobody picked up on. The President said nothing about "bending the cost curve" in medicare by not running every conceivable test procedure for an elderly patient who is Already dying of some specific disease, like pancreatic cancer. There was nothing about "bending the cost curve" by adjusting our mal practice laws a bit to prevent frivelous law suits. To me the President was pretty much devoid of ideas and I stick by that. Of course you know many people when they hear the terms "government jobs program" think "congressional pork barrel projects". Perhaps the "no earmarks" provision really is NOT that good of an idea. I guess you could see "I failed to see the Grand Vision" in Obama's address.

Of course mental imaging is seen by many as a valuable thing. For instance they say if you are nervous before speaking in public to a large audience, to just picture them in their underwear. I don't think that would work. Of course Captain Piccard was once bullied by this Cardassian officer as a POW. And the officer told this story about being a six year old boy and some big kids stole his candy that he'd found somewhere. And Piccard said "That's IT- - from now on I'm going to picture as that little six year old boy. Of course I went Piccard one better in picturing Rev Bill Halliday as a naked eight year old girl. The impitus for that thought picture came from the book, "Elvis - We Love You Tender". Of course you know how every teenager wants a "Mojo filter" in his wallet for status even if he's never "seen any action" himself. Particularly if he's getting into his late teens, he might get a little worried. Well here is a thought picture for you about Dick Chaney. Just picture him as that teenager with a condom in his wallet, collecting dust. After all Dick Chaney is the grand daddy of all Powers because he's seen five deferments to military service. The next time Dick Chaney talks about having a pump installed, ask him "And on what part of the body is that?" Hey- I'm just trying to be helpful.

This is Monday September 12, 2011 and I was drowsing during the end of Stephanie Miller and the first 45 minutes of Thom Hartman. Then I kept hearing these noises from the coffee pot and looked to see that the thing had been on all this time with only a half cup of coffee remaining. I drank that and diluted it a bit and added creamer. Then with the money I’d managed to scrape together I went out and bought another pack of John Black cherries that will last me another day. I am still not “ready” to do the next blog. Of course when I do it it will contain material that was pretty much all planned out as of Saturday, when I wasn’t feeling well. Of course as you know both Stu and Keith Relf in their baby incarnations didn’t last too long. One wonders whether both has an “escape clause’ in them, or more likely they just “butted in line” ahead of whoever was supposed to be incarnated in them in the first place, so in a few years both just stepped aside.

This posting is getting so long we are going to skip another paragraph originally planned for this post, on a completely different subject. I am told that the Republicans are having another debate tonight, so I'll hunt for it in a few minutes. I guess we have two weeks and two days till the rapture, if you're in to that sort of thing. It has come to my attention that depreciation laws are kind of a rip-off for businesses because X percent of businesses fail within the first few years and never get to take all that depreciation of capital goods they spent. Also I have learned that if a piece of equipment fails that you need to conduct your business- - replacing it cannot be taken as an expense against income. This seems patently unfair to me, and is a matter that I would suggest to the republicans as a provision change we can work on.