Today in less than an hour the Supreme Court is going to be hearing oral arguments on the gay issue. I suppose that's better than Rectal Arguments. That is at ten o clock for us late risers here on the west coast. In terms of New York time I slept in and didn't get up till eight thirty and was able to only catch a half an hour of Bill Press. Sometimes the other side can make what I would regard as sound statements with valid conclusions. For instance- - it's been pointed out that Churches perform weddings, but States perform Marriages. In every single ceremony you'll hear you'll hear the words "By the authority granted me by the State of California". Now in these "shotgun weddings' back in the hills- - I don't know what they do. My understanding is they'd just drag the poor guy in front of a preacher and perform the ceremony. Churches perform weddings, but States legitimize marriages. Someone else talked about how if it's not our place to Judge anybody and that it's God alone who judges- - then we should wait for God to weigh in on the issue, and if God Himself declines to weigh in on the issue as somehow important or significant to him, then who are we to judged? I have used this same argument Myself- - though not on this issue. Of course I'll remind you that it says "Do not Judge", which is not the same is You must Acquit". It would be just as wrong for me to Forgive the sins of a mass murderer, for instance, as it would be for me to Judge someone when God himself has not judged him. These are just things in logic we need to be aware of.
This morning I watched that You Tube video on the Hicks Boson particle. The speaker has a nack for stating things in terms ordenary people can understand without unduly taxing their brains. First it's matter of smashing things. And when you've smashed things into as small a component as possible with the implement you have you may say "Well, that's it". Till the day when someone comes along with a better smasher. It used to be the molicule was seen as the undividable unit. Then it was the Atom. For a long time it was the basic atomic particles of electrons, protons and newtrons. But then in 1964 we enter the realm of the sub atomic particle. It seems that there are other broad types of subatomic particles other than quarks and leptons. It would seem that the boson is a basic type of particle, and the Hicks boson is a specific type of boson. I'd like to get off message here for just a bit to talk about the distinction between "Special" and "General" as I define these words. I believe in Special Grace, but not General Grace. Another word for special would be specific- - or here's something out of Catholic theology - - - Accidental. I believe in accidental grace the same way I believe a person can overcome the one in a million odds and win the Power Ball lotterey seven times- - as is claimed happened. If they say it happened, then it happened. But it is an - - say it with me- - an Accident. It is a specific and isolated event. It is as it were a snapshot in Time. But what theologians need to beware of is the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. OK I'll get off that high horse for now. My point is that I believe in specific Grace- - from God- - but I don't believe in General Grace from God. Because if you generalize something it become an - - say it with me- - an Entitlement. And grace is something we are not - - Entitled to. It's something we don't deserve and didn't earn, just as- - finding a broken down ice cream truck on a mountain hill with lots of good ice cream just there for the taking- - is something we Didn't Earn and don't deserve- - or being Raped is something we didn't earn and nobody deserves. Therefore to base a Religion on an Accident- - - to me is an oxy moronism. They always say that "God isn't an Accident' or however it goes. And yet they take the accidental- - and generalize it into some kind of a moral mandate, or moral test that they've passed- - and you never will because it's their job always to remain in control over you - - (otherwise they'd be out of work) (Selah)
OK let's do take two right now. Anyhow- - - we were talking about sub atomic particles. And we are informed by the speaker that the whole catalog of sub atomic particles fits together in a marvelous, grand puzzle with certain theories - - were one to look at the whole- - which haven't been proved yet but are Out There to BE Proved. (Selah) One of them is the existance of the Hicks Boson or whatever. Then the speaker began talking about various forces. He talked about magnetic force- - of the earth. We know how magnatism affects things electrically and charge wise. There are radio waves- - and there is also particle energy called photons- - which are a different form of energy. But somehow "If we could turn it all off" and get on some other planet without radio waves or a magnetic field- - then we'd at last have peace, with nothing in our Vacuum - - except nothingness. But after you have "turned off everything' there is something you can't turn off and that is this Hicks-boson machine- - or field energy contained in the vacuum. Keep in mind that Albert Einstein is on the losing side of this issue and I am on the winning side because I have always or for a long time believed in some sort of Ether- - as a logical deduction of wave propigation. You readers of mine know this. So where are they looking for these particles. There is this giant partical accelerator in Geneva Switzerland or whereever that is a fifteen foot circle. And they were colliding electrons and positrons- - which of course would normally produce - - photons. But these particles weren't heavy enough to produce the proper "ripple' in the boson field they were looking for. (I am even now not entirely sure what specific thing or Sign they were looking for amidst the mountains of data that they analyzed afterward) But they had to refurbish this big cyclotron and so they moved to a smaller one in the United States that was still oppertive. But before they closed the big one down in Europe- - late last summer they finally found what they were looking for, and I guess in going through more data- - they found more confirmation of the Hicks boson- - just in the past few weeks. We don't have to wait four more years.
OK I guess we'll call this take three. Some of you are saying to me "OK, but how does all this affect the price of tea in China? How is it relative to my life". I'll tell you. Because it could be that is we turn off this whole "boson apperatus' of space- - we can "shut down" gravity and mass as we know it. Hence, we will have been well on our way to inventing the fabled Warp Drive of Star Trek fame. According to the speaker, if there were no boson field in empty space- - then everything would move through space- - at Infinite speed because there would be nothing to slow it down. He spoke of how electrons travel the speed of light. My view is that were the boson field shut down or "turned off" then light speed itself would be no limitation because as I myself have argued- - it's the Ether that itself limits light propigation to its present speed. But more than that- - mass and Time given the relation they have- - there would be no Time. Time would not Pass. I say that because the speaker then goes on to say "There was a period when the Hicks boson apperatus was not yet switched on. But he says it took place "Pico seconds after the original Big Bang". That's not much time. A pico second is a trillionth of a second. Back at Golden West they used to talk about pico-ferads in condenser microphones, or capacatents microphones. So this would suggest to me that Time as we know it- - did not proceed or progress- - in that early era- - so that there is no way of even properly Measuring the era. It also harkens back to my recent theory of only a few weeks ago- - that there were Causes and Events long ago that were not "In time" but were all acrambled up and made no Sense, because there were not yet scientific laws to give them a "Template" or sense or order or pattern. But rather than speak of the "God particle' that fills the Universe- - as this man does- - I then spoke of a "God Force" that hurled "Events" per see- - INTO some sort of forward Time Vortex. I think were Bones or Jim Morrison to look at the You Tube theory they would say that the God particle- - itself is an Accident- - in which - - one can argue that All Time is in essence an Accident. We need it to say "something happened". But time itself - - can manifest itself- - Time need not manifest itself in only one Way. This is what I think Bones would say about this. In otherwise the adage of "Everything that CAN happen HAS happened is still intact". (Selah)
No comments:
Post a Comment