This is Thursday March 28th and I just finished dinner. We had barbecued chicken with baked beans and corn with lemon pudding for desert. I got seconds on the beans and a little chicken from Dora, even though our table was at the end of the line. Tonight is the Last Supper in Christian lands, which is the closest thing we Christians have to Passover. We Christians of the Protestent perswasion use the empty cross and not the Crucifix because we don't believe in transsubstantion- - or re enacting the breaking of the body of Christ every time mass is said. One of the residents around here with seemingly a lot of money to throw around invited a bunch of us out for a decent lunch at one of the local resturants. I've been getting extra food from unexpected sources lately and hopefully that means that I have gained some weight.
I checked out World Net Daily for the first time in months. They are now a lot more video intensive than they used to be. I watched a video on the Twelfth Iman- - which is the Messiah figure in Shiite Islam. Apparently the notion that Satan is rallying his forces into some sort of a unified push is given support because Akmadenijab or Iran recently praised the now deceast Hugh Chavaz because it was his hope that on the resurrection that Chavez would be there with the Twelfth Imam, who is expected to do many signs and wonders and sway masses of people, and if it were possible, even the Elect. The speaker went on to talk about how at Armageddon it would be Russia allied with Iran and Lybia attacking Israel from the North but by then Syria would no longer exist as a nation, which is an interesting prediction you can now make for the next headline, and Syria's non existance soon is not out of the realm of possability, one way or another. Of course it seems to be a strictly Shiite attack. They are the messianic ones, because Saudi Arabia and Iraq are not on the list of enemies to fear.
Nicole Sandler got her knickers in a twist all over Pat Robertson's remark about this woman who wanted to marry a man but she wanted him to accept her three adopted children, that are all from different countries. As Pat Robertson said you never know what is in their past - - and we all can't be Superman to take a shot in the dark to marry a woman not knowing all we're in for. But Nicole Sandler accused Pat Robertson of being a racist or something. We are reminded that the gun lobby is alive and well and that there are other videos on the Right stating that there "all sorts of guns and munitions being stockpiled by the Homeland Security Department to attack the citizens with, and so I guess when they come at us with all the power of the US government- - somehow a few AK 47's will take care of the problem. There is another story about vigelante Police patroling various beaches because they stop people on the way to the beach and check for drugs pointing guns at them and everything. This vigelante group (like the Guardian Angels, I guess) are not above gunning down police officers should they get in the way. But they are saying "We're trying to prevent drug deals that happen on these beaches". For all I know maybe this story was in some other country. It kind of sounds like it. Ted Nugent is saying that the country would be better off is the South had won the Civil War. There are times when I myself think Blacks would have been better off. Moe Kelly pointed out that Abolitionists regarded the end of the institution of slavery as their goal. Because even Lincoln was quoted that he can't say one way or the other whether Blacks are inferior to Whites, or not. But the point is they weren't interested in what happened to Black people after they were freed. I guess the President was making more anti gun speeches today. And there is more anger at Majority Leader Harry Reed because he did not eliminate the fillibuster or three-fifths rule, when he had the option of doing that at the beginning of this year. Because now we may not get any gun bill at all, not even a straw trader plrovision at gun shows or a background check. And now Mario Rubio has lended his support to the movement of Republicans in the Senate to fillibuster any and all gun bills. I keep hearing new stories every day to what nutty fringe extreme the Other Side is going to- - and that they are losing the support of the American People. But nothing is showing up in legislation yet, anywhere. Many of these major State Governments in the Midwest are in the firm grip of a reactionary government.
Moe Kelly's program this morning is well worth replaying. He interviewed this Reverand Dion why who has his theological act together in a way I have rarely seen. After all Adam and Eve weren't entitled to get various government tax benefits when they came together. And a divinely sanctioned marriage could hardly include a woman on her fourth or fifth husband, could it? Also it was noted that when you get married you can either go to a minister or priest, or a justice of the peace. But when you get a Divorce, the Church won't perform that. You have to go to a secular government to get unspliced. So it can be noted that the secular government appears to have hegemeny here. Every ceremony says "By the authority granted me by the State of California". Moe Kelly noted that many gay people given a choice wouldn't care to be married anyhow, and some people who now endorse gay marriage like Hollywood Celebreties- - don't even LIKE gays- but it's the politically sheek thing to do to boost record or video sales or what have you, and their agent tells them to do it. People want the tax advantages- - and there are eleven hundred of them - - that come along with the Christmas packages that comes with being married. Moe Kelly points out that the whole red ribbon fad with AIDS was the same way, and there came a point where it was no longer fashionable to wear those red ribbons any more. It was also noted that MEN generally led the Black civil right's movement and nobody fifty years ago even questioned this. After all that's what men did. Men took the initiative and led, and most likely their women wouldn't have it any other way. There is a basic social coservatism in the Black community where the whole idea of gay marriage is a little nonsensical. Moe Kelly points out that I am not the only one out here in radio land that doesn't regard Gay Marriage as any advancement of my personal civil liberties or rights.
Stay tuned. The Opus Magnum is yet to come. I had a nice little conversation with Jim Morrison this morning and he said a lot of interesting stuff. He takes on the rather literal Biblical definition of marriage that he be of opposite sexes but need not necessarily be monogamus, but that polygamy is allowed. And he explained why in geometric terms. For instance we know that two points DEFINE a line and that three points DEFINE a plane and four points DEFINE a volume. In other words, they lay out the peramaters of said Line or Plane or Volume. But for instance the area emcompassed by a four dimensional entity could not be called a Volume, because the term Volume denotes three dimensional items in the same way that Marriage is something you have that denotes two sexes and not one sex or three sexes. It states that for instance that two dots define a LINE. But is the LINE limited by just these two dots and two dots only? No ANY other dot may form as a part of that LINE as long as it conforms to the peramaters of those first two dots. In the same way the Bible says a man may have more than one wife- - assuming that he is able to "maintain" the relationship with his first wife. In like manner a plane can have many more than three dots as long as the other dots are "co pleanear". Many now claim that what the homosexual community really wants is all the Perks of Marriage- much more than they regard the Institution of Marriage Itself. (Selah) In Captain Piccard's words dealing with Moriarity- - "I need to find him a way of giving him what he wants without giving him what he wants". I wish there were some way we Democrats could do THAT with the Republicans. Give them something they have been claiming to Want- - and yet something that will cost us little. (Selah) So we know that four lines will define a Volume. What will Five lines define? But Jim Morrison points out that four points only define a Volume within a common time frame. Otherwise you are left with not a volume but a mere surface area and some as yet Unspecified denotion of Time. (Selah) So the thing is that to describe ANYTHING- - - in the macro sense - - you need Five - - points. Which isn't just a city in southern California. Five points will define anything. Mal Evans told Jim that the Five means you have three of space and two of Time. But this is not exactly the case. Because unlike our geometric line where you need TWO points to define it- - with Time you only need ONE point to define it- - one point along a circle or possibly along a sphere surface. "It really doesn't make any difference, Jim says. It's all about how Compilcated you want to make it for yourself. Because you can't really have Two dimensions of Time because Time lines never cross and as such never interact with each other. Instead each one is "an actor out alone" in an exestential state of sequestration or Isolation from any other line. Only in our hypothetical Circle do we find a common measurement and we use this circle to denote an equal "Advancement' line in whatever (completely independant) type system. But according to Jim Morrison- - ALL universes in whatever time line are three dimensional because "That's way the chips are designed to fall". (Presumably Designed by God) So what you have here is not a two and three relation but a four and one relation. But then I raised the idea of "How do you know which one of these hypothetical points in some (higher demensional?) space void out there- - how do you know Which one of these five dots represent Time. Jim says "It doesn't really matter because time and space and mass function all as a unit and with one you get all the others." And then I said "So you could have five identical dots and say This one rather than That one represented Time and so what would happen?" Jim said, "There you go, now you're catching on!" I go "Catching on to WHAT? And Jim left me to ponder this. I thought about it. If Time dots and Space does are indistinguishable in this hyperspace or whatever Void out there- - then it would seem that a different dot would be a Different time line- - and that - - since Time is a radius from a point you only need one DOT or POINT to know exactly where you are- - the way Bees in a hive "point' in one direction to show where the flower for the nectar is. But is another Dot of the five were Time than the spacial perameters of the other dots would define a different space- - and the whole thing would be on some other Time Line. Time is straight but the cross grid points would be perpendicular only at that instant- like base E is with exponents. If you try to go latteral at this line it HAS to be curved in order to keep equal distance from the Big Bang Origen of the whole Shabang. I did remember one thing that Jim told me. He said that IT COULD WELL BE THAT ALL OF THE MATTER IS IN ALL OF THE UNIVERSES AT THE SAME TIME THAT WE ALL VIEW THE SAME MATTER BUT THAT THE TIME FACTOR CAUSES WHAT YOU COULD CALL AN "ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT" IN THAT IT'S MERELY THE DIMENSION WE ARE VIEWING SAID MATTER FROM THAT MAKES IT APPEAR DIFFERENT. Mal Evans told me last week that the Psychic Funnel in Karmic Space would be the Portal by which we enter that given person's Physical World, or at least His view of it. But he hasn't proved this one yet. HAGO UN FELIS DESPUES DE ZOA PRESENTE (I probably murdered that!)
No comments:
Post a Comment